PDA

View Full Version : the myth of wicking?


bordertangoman
05-07-2010, 05:53 AM
THE MYTH OF WICKING


There is a lot of pseudo-science surrounding the subject of "wicking". Let's be clear about this. A "wick" is a strip of fabric made of organic fibres such as cotton, linen or hemp, used in oil lamps. Oil is sucked up by the porous fibres from the pool of oil. When the synthetic manufacturers needed to describe the process by which their synthetic clothing dried, they obviously felt that the term "drip" (for this is what it really does) was not suitable for their advertising campaigns, and so they came up with the idea of turning the noun "wick" into a new verb - "to wick".
The problem is that most oil-based synthetics cannot "wick" in any sense of the word as they are incapable of absorbing moisture, any more in fact that a plastic washing up bowl. They are non-porous. Moisture only moves through synthetic clothing by virtue of the knit construction. This ensures that the lines of knitting slope outwards, and gravity does the rest - dripping!

Merino, like all wools, actually absorbs moisture, and then sheds it gradually to its outer surface. This is "wicking". No synthetic can do it - only attempt an approximation of it.

There are cellulose-based fabrics coming on to the market now, bamboo being one, however these can absorb far too much moisture and then hang on to it, creating a cold wet garment that can add to the dangers of hyperthermia for the wearer. For use for hot (dry) weather garments, these fabrics may be fine, but they are not suitable for all-round, all-weather, garments.

There is a commonly held belief that a wicking base layer will stop your clothing becoming damp and sweaty. This is not necessarily true. It depends on what you are wearing on top of your baselayer.

When you work hard your body produces perspiration to help you keep cool. If you are stark naked, this sweat normally evaporates from the surface of your skin. If you are wearing a single layer of absorbent clothing, the sweat will be absorbed by this layer, and eventually evaporate into the atmosphere if it is warm enough. When you stop working hard, or just slow down a bit, and start to cool down, the absorbent layer you are wearing will become cold and damp next to your skin.

A "wicking" garment is supposed to pass the perspiration through from your skin to the next clothing layer. However it can only pass it from its own inner surface to its own outer surface. Each succeeding layer must do it's own job of passing on the perspiration to the next layer until it eventually gets to the outer surface and is passed into the atmosphere. If one of these intermediate layers is absorbent it will absorb the perspiration as well as passing it on - but only "if". As we said before, synthetic fibres do not absorb moisture. They "drip". Their interlock construction allows moisture to trickle down through the gaps.

You can therefore have the situation of wearing high performance wicking underwear giving you a dry comfortable skin but your cotton or synthetic midlayer is very damp under your breathable jacket, making you feel cold - and possibly giving you wet feet!

For maximum performance wicking underwear requires a middle layer which will wick at a similar rate and an outer layer capable of passing the perspiration rapidly to the atmosphere. Because of merino's ability to both absorb and shed moisture, and because of its ability to keep you warm even when wet, it makes an ideal base layer and mid layer under any outer layer."

http://www.chocolatefishmerino.co.uk/technical/wicking.html

Chris Stratton
05-07-2010, 05:17 PM
I suspect evaporation is what actually happens, not dripping

Ron deChasse
05-07-2010, 05:32 PM
This would have added to the 'Undershirt for men' thread nicely, though women could find the info useful, too.

I know this is only semantics, but it is not so much gravity but capillary action which moves moisture away from your skin, just as a wick draws lampoil upward. The term 'drip' almost implies that your clothing is only moving moisture when you are so wet as to become a safety hazard to yourself and others (joking).

While the outdoorsmen engage in strenuous activities in, sometimes, extreme ambient temperatures and conditions, we, as dancers, mostly operate in somewhat mild environments. So, baselayer, insulating layer, outer layer is really too much for us to wear. What concerns us more, I think, is comfort and performance of a garment under a single cotton or cotton blend shirt.

While a lot of what we find on the internet, and elsewhere, about the merits of whichever cloth fiber is mostly marketing hype, we, on this forum, are able to discuss their respective virtues without bias. Lucky us! Let's do it...

I concur with your statements, BTangoman, regarding the various fibers and thier performance. I have no experience with cellulose fibers, but you make them seem very unappealing. I've heard that the newest synthetics are impressive, but from what I know of polypropylene, I'm not inclined to spend my money to try them out. Cotton, to me, is mildly miserable whether it is hot and wet or cold and clammy. It is only comfortable if it is dry. Wool (merino), by far my favorite, is comfortable to me dry, damp, wet, hot or cold. It feels good when I first put it on, then has that unconscious comfort of just feeling right. The kind of comfort where I'm not mindful of sweat on my body, and only need to mop my forehead and neck between dances.

As far as wicking sweat to your outer layer goes, I don't see a lot of difference between cotton and synthetics. Wool, as I understand it, begins to transfer moisture in a vapor state (earlier than others (?)), so you may be able to engage in mild sweat inducing activities and still look fresh longer (?). But I don't know, that may be some of the marketing hype that I mentioned before.

This discussion is worth carrying on. Someone, please, tell us something we don't know, or confirm or deny our beliefs about clothing fibers.

On a side note for those of us who care. As the producers of wool, sheep do take a fairly heavy toll on their environment, however may have a less undesirable impact on our planet than the chemical processes of manufacturing synthetics or the heavy pesticide use of the cotton plantations...just a thought.

opendoor
05-08-2010, 03:05 AM
Think conducting, or channeling would be more suitable. "Wicking" in the original sense would be the worst case what can happen at all, so you are right. The challenge is to keep the saturated gaseous phase as effectiv as can be.

cowboydancer
05-20-2010, 02:06 PM
So, to jump threads.... what is the best shirt (brand and style please) to wear under dance clothes. In my ProAm competition, I wear a base layer, and either a shirt or a shirt and vest over the base layer. Add in a cowboy hat (required for leaders) and you have a HOT environment.

An undershirt by Smartwool has been recomended. Any other recomendations?

--Tony

Warren J. Dew
05-20-2010, 09:56 PM
As far as wicking sweat to your outer layer goes, I don't see a lot of difference between cotton and synthetics.

You may not see a difference, but I feel a huge difference between 100% cotton and common synthetic blends like poly/cotton. Cotton wicks much better.

Hey, you asked for something that you didn't know.

wooh
05-20-2010, 10:39 PM
When it comes to partner dance, I think what usually happens is the man wears a shirt that "wicks" and instead of being absorbed by another layer they are wearing, rather than "dripping" or "evaporating," the now clammy sweat just ends up on whatever woman they happen to be dancing with.

bordertangoman
05-21-2010, 04:39 AM
When it comes to partner dance, I think what usually happens is the man wears a shirt that "wicks" and instead of being absorbed by another layer they are wearing, rather than "dripping" or "evaporating," the now clammy sweat just ends up on whatever woman they happen to be dancing with.

oh course the converse is true; one can end up dancing with a clammy sweaty woman....
:lol:

wooh
05-21-2010, 03:19 PM
Yeah, but women dress to look pretty, the sweat going where it does is just an unplanned for side effect. Men go and pick out these sweat wicking shirts on purpose, thus purposefully getting the sweat off of them and on their innocent partners.

Ron deChasse
05-21-2010, 05:04 PM
Actually, wooh, we are discussing the properties of various undershirt materials. We wear undershirts to keep our outer garments as dry as possible out of consideration for our partners. We are looking for the best fabrics because we really would prefer that you enjoy dancing with us.