Ask questions, meet dancers, and be part of the conversation.
- Lastly, I am also completely bored with nuevo dancers using the same, thoroughly deadpan, "bored magazine model" expression on the face. Models are coached to use these expressions to draw attention away from themselves and to the clothing. It's the kiss of death for any performance, in my opinion, and so many nuevos dancer seem to use it.
Regarding the deadpan expression--I see that on the vast majority of dancers, regardless of style. I know I'm the same way. It's not lack of emotion, necessarily, just concentration on anything and everything other than what my face is doing. If I wanted to think about facial expressions and emoting for other people, I'd be interested in ballroom. Which I'm not. (In fact, I hate the ballroom emoting.)
I don't see how it's a big deal, though, that they look like they're not enjoying it. I'm sure they probably are enjoying themselves--else, why would they spend enough time practicing and dancing together to get to the point that they're performing, eh? How many times have we all said, on this forum, that so much of the joy of AT is what goes on between the dancers themselves, invisible to anyone watching. Why should this be any different?
so, this is probably a stupid question, but what makes the first video tango nuevo? okay, i only watched the first two minutes (the song bored me pretty quickly), but i saw lots of sacadas, ganchos, blocks, leg wraps, colgadas, etc. all in open.
wasn't all that done in 'traditional' tango as well? what's new about it? is it the predominance of those kinds of motions?
i guess i'm curious because i don't see myself as adhering to any particular style, at least not consciously. definitely not 'milongeuro' -- definitely not nuevo. elements of both, probably... but whenever i read that such and such is supposed to be a distinctive of one style or other, i end up thinking, isn't that just a subset of tango?
when i care to think about it, i get confused...
Heh...that debate... I think it depends on the audience. If it's for an experienced AT-dancing crowd, then making them feel involved is vastly less important, and engaging the interest comes from good musicality and good technique.I believe this should be different because it is a performance that should (ideally) engage peoples' interest and make them feel involved. And you are right - many people say the tango is about what those two people feel, period, regardless of what others might see or think. I think this is part of the "Tango performances aren't real tango" debate.