I don't understand the reason of your harshness and sarcasm.
I have nothing against pivots, nothing against open embrace, and nothing against non traditional music.
I'm just trying to understand why you define that as nuevo.
The pivot is one key element - and again you seem to be willfully missing the entire concept of the words "based around".
The pivot is a key element of
tango at less since the floor of the ballrooms allowed it.
You also seem to be ignoring my other 2 criteria for differentiation - the music and the embrace.
I just asked for clarification about the first one because it was not very clear to me and because it is quite uncommon: it's the first time I hear of it.
The second criterion has nothing to do with the dance, so I am ignoring it because we are talking about dance.
The third criterion is the one apparently adopted by most of people: they just use "nuevo" as a synonim for "open embrace". I have nothing to object except the pointlessness of calling it in that way.
But if you seriously believe that people pivot as much in close embrace, to traditional music, as they do in open embrace to non-traditional music (and vice versa), then we'll just have to agree to disagree.
I seriously believe that people pivot as much in
tango salon, to traditional music, as they do in
nuevo to non-traditional music, and maybe a little more.
Unless you are not confusing tango salon with apilado I just can't understand why you think there should be less pivots.