How much is too much to pay for a lesson?

Larinda McRaven said:
I wish I had never had a lesson with anyone who cost less than $150 right from the beginning....ever!
I wish we all could afford to take from Eggleton and Gleave, like Larinda...
 
She does have a bit of a point about shoes, in that sometimes people will look at you a little differently if you say, for instance, that your coach is Charlotte Jorgensen than Jane Doe. Doesn't wearing Ferragamo shoes give people a different impression of you than wearing Payless shoes?

However, with respect to lessons, the price you should pay depends on the level of your dancing. Although there is some variation within the price of coaches of a given level, generally the higher-level the coach, the more s/he will cost. I'd say the quality of the coach is more important than finding someone cheap, although that's certainly a very subjective trait.
 
I pay currently pay $65 per lesson, which is a great value. When a coach is brought in, prices have ranged from $90 per session up to around $135 per session. I'd agree that the quality of the instructor or coach is more important than the cost.
 
I agree with people that say it depends with whom and for whom... I would love to be able to have taken only from the top teachers from the beginning like Larinda said. Although I do appreciate my first teacher who was great, and affordable..

I constantly kill my budget because of lessons and visiting teachers, but it is really worth it.
 
If people are willing to pay and take the lesson, than it's not too much. If teacher start loosing all the students, than perhaps he doesn't teach well, ore charges way too much..
 
Here's a slightly different question.

Should coaches refrain from charging more than a certain amount per hour from their students? Now of course this will vary in the ways we have discussed on this thread previously. However, what I'm getting at is: do coaches have the responsibility, on some level, to try to ensure that the knowledge they have to teach is accessible to almost anyone who wants to learn, or only to those who are fortunate enough to have the wherewithall to be able to pay for it? Once again, not trying to be over-critical of the coaches who work hard for their fees, I know. I'm just wondering about the ethics of this and whether anyone on the forum has given thought to it.
 
Joe said:
She does have a bit of a point about shoes, in that sometimes people will look at you a little differently if you say, for instance, that your coach is Charlotte Jorgensen than Jane Doe. Doesn't wearing Ferragamo shoes give people a different impression of you than wearing Payless shoes?

However, with respect to lessons, the price you should pay depends on the level of your dancing. Although there is some variation within the price of coaches of a given level, generally the higher-level the coach, the more s/he will cost. I'd say the quality of the coach is more important than finding someone cheap, although that's certainly a very subjective trait.

WHO you take from has zero bearing on how pros teach you - they know for instance that anyone who comes up with the money can get a lesson - it's not like YOUR ability is judged before you give them your money, after all - you didn't audition for the lesson, did you? Lots of proammers take lots of lessons from top coaches, who (if they are truly professional) treat them like they would a dedicated amateur or a pro. And usually the proammers are the bulk of the $$s spent in a studio... so you expect Mary Proam to say "I take from (inseert famed coach name here)" since it is part of their political edge to go with well known coaches. I'm only impressed with the results (how well the student dances).

I totally disagree that the price depends on your 'level'. Actually, better dancers need DIFFERENT information than beginners, but all students need GOOD information, and the price of that information is not scaled to the 'difficulty' of the information, or the quality of the information.

A beginner getting real solid information from a great teacher at a high cost gets much more value than mediocre information at low cost. In fact, it is ultimately damaging in the long run - you'll just have to redo and rethink in a few years, anyway, once you begin to understand more and you see the limitations of 'that great teacher who only charged xxx'...

A common problem? beginners who think they do NOT need to understand basic actions. Or beginners who think a lesson is 'good' when they are happy at the end. Or beginners who think that quantity of lessons is value, rather than the quality.

Remember, advanced dancers work on very basic actions in their lessons. The common thread is: "I just took a lesson with xxxx. It was awesome!." "Really? What did you work on?" "A natural turn. For an hour".
 
Well they have to recover their investment somehow. They spent thousands and thousands of dollars to arrive at a certain level of expertise. They took hours of expensive lessons...
 
saludas said:
The common thread is: "I just took a lesson with xxxx. It was awesome!." "Really? What did you work on?" "A natural turn. For an hour".
or moving from foot to foot.. or moving forward and back :)
 
Katarzyna said:
Well they have to recover their investment somehow. They spent thousands and thousands of dollars to arrive at a certain level of expertise. They took hours of expensive lessons...

I totally agree...no reason why they shouldn't make a decent living
 

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top