TangoRocks
Member
I need to go on a washing machine course![]()
Nah, just RTFM. (I know, I wrote dishwasher users manuals in a former life, lol...)
Ask questions, meet dancers, and be part of the conversation.
I need to go on a washing machine course![]()
I wish you were wrong, but fear you may be right.
I suspect that the unemployment numbers may be related to how the unemployment figure is calculated. If signs of recovery make lots of people flock back into the job market, then unemployment numbers go up. I suspect that a lot of "discouraged workers" may be choosing to take another shot at getting a job after long term unemployment. The numbers make sense. They're just disappointing.
Other than looking at actual applications for unemployment benefits, how do "they" come up with these numbers? I mean there are a ton of people between jobs and looking or not looking who don't qualify for unemployment or don't think they do or don't want to take it. It is probably impossible to account for those people.Also, unemployment numbers don't include people who have just given UP looking for a job, so those stats can be very misleading.
The short answer is: it's complicated.Other than looking at actual applications for unemployment benefits, how do "they" come up with these numbers? I mean there are a ton of people between jobs and looking or not looking who don't qualify for unemployment or don't think they do or don't want to take it. It is probably impossible to account for those people.
Iirc?
True enough. There are difficulties with measuring the number. I'd bet dollars to donuts that the BLS numbers are estimates. There is inherent error when working with estimates. That said, I trust BLS data. They have their issues like any other data, but I have worked with it and know some of their methodologies and it's pretty good. If its anything like the numbers I/my division produce/s, I definitely trust it.Also remember that unemployment figrues aren't necesarrily meant to show exactly how many people are out of work, but instead to be used as an index to compare to previous numbers. It's meant as an index/gauge, not as a definitive count