Ah, well, this is a different scenario entirely. In the ballroom forum, you'll hear these personas referred to as "visiting coaches." There is never any restrictive contract language for working with them.The teachers I had privates with (in BR, salsa, tango) were always at the height of their success and didn't need to be hired by a studio. They traveled the continent, skimming the cream. Studio owners were always grateful and subservient when such a star showed up.
No, the situation being discussed here are is about small-time local teachers, most of whom are beholden to the studio where they work. They don't have a reputation that would allow them to teach independently and command that sort of power. But they are the ones we work with the most, because they are vastly cheaper, vastly more available, and are much more likely to take a personal interest in our growth. All of that adds value, which is why restrictive fraternization language is tolerated at all.
ETA: I picked up the American style fairly late, and could credibly claim that, at this point, I only study that style with visiting coaches. But the only reason this works is that I've already put in a decade of intense focus on closely-related dance skills, and so can do a lot of self-guidance in between those rare visits. Working exclusively with visiting coaches is not a realistic formula for someone of intermediate experience or less, I think.
Unless they are wallowing in cash and have essentially unlimited budget, that is. I have seen that a couple of times, too. Folks who travel across the country on a bi-weekly basis, or pay a coach to do the same, and think nothing of the staggering cost.
Last edited: