Completely agree with you that it's the most difficult. That's why I think people should learn leading and following in close embrace. It helps a lot in establishing walking technique, balance, connection and musicality. One can then learn to open the embrace to do more difficult musical expressions. I think a nice dance will inevitably involve a very fluid embrace, close to open to close again.
Each to their own I suppose.
For me and many others, it is open hold that is much easier
than in the embrace. I use it and a closer practice hold to explain/demonstrate
or to work something out with a partner but not at milongas.
But of course it depends what kind of embrace(*) you're talking about. Sadly
it seems that in Europe (close) embrace includes every type of variation.
D&M are now embodying that concept in the UK. Salon/VU is possibly
easier, in line and apilado definitely not (for me anyway).
See:
http://web.archive.org/web/20110128173753/http://www.tangokombinat.de/uk_abrazos_con.htm
Here you will even see a redefinition of Milonguero to suit European tastes.
This is
Argentine Tango, and milonguero has come to describe a popular
style danced in central BsAs. Can't we respect that, perhaps by inventing
a new catchall description for the whole range of (close) embraces.
Whose got the imagination and the equivalent clout of a Susana Miller.
(*)I still refuse to call open hold any kind of embrace.
In fact the only embrace is a close one, you don't hug at a distance.
So no qualifiers are needed, except perhaps in the US where two words
are often used when one is enough.
For me open hold is a practice hold, it's all it's fit for.
And now many words will rain down upon me.
Note I'm not talking Nuevo here - I'm concerned with social
Argentine Tango where the space consuming, feel deleted
open hold is not appropriate.