Are milongas getting shorter?

Perhaps it's your British soul; my German one is notoriously much more susceptible, Rabbit.
But to the point: For me, the initial exclusion was a great incentive. The dancing itself was actually secondary. For me, tango was a place of social learning and of being seen. And of course, I quickly wanted to belong to the priestly caste of that cult myself.
 
The character of milongas has changed: today, a milonga mainly caters to students from the specific dance school.
This is yet one more thing that depends on where you live and dance. Most tango dancers worldwide (80-85%, depending on whose research you trust) are not in Buenos Aires or Montevideo. The dance and its culture are no longer defined exclusively by those cities and their traditions, much less their older traditions.

I live and dance in a francophone North American city 9,000 km from el río de la Plata, where a negligible number of people speak Spanish (or anything other than French or English) or visit Argentina. Yet we've had tango since 1991, when my coach and her then-life partner founded the first studio (this relationship is why I know local history on the topic). Before that, it was merely one of many exotic foreign dances that was known here mainly from films and traveling shows. After that, people here danced it themselves. Also after that, it was always taught at schools resident in studios and danced at milongas resident in the same schools; to this day, there are vanishingly few exceptions to "studio = school = milonga."

Before that, there were a rare few who learned tango via informal social arrangements (i.e., mentorship or apprenticeship) in immigrant families, but they weren't even close to numerous enough to host or attend milongas – milongas where they could dance while students watched simply didn't exist. There was never a time here when students watched milongueros. That phenomenon is owned by another, foreign culture that failed to put down deep roots here; they settled in Toronto instead, because they're about 40 times more likely to speak English than to speak French, and French-language competency is an immigration requirement inside the borders of Québec.

While I respect that there was a change in tango in BA, it wasn't mirrored where I live, where post-change tango has been the only tango for 35 years (i.e., for more time than our younger dancers have been alive). Dancers in BA may well dislike how people who outnumber them 5:1 or 6:1 worldwide have altered tango culture worldwide, but this is an inevitable consequence of marketing something globally (which is what the earliest teachers did) in any domain, be it dance, music, visual arts, or for that matter food, cars, or fast fashion.

I don't mean any of this in a snarky way. I just think it's important to acknowledge the roles of region and evolution if we want tango to continue to exist. Needless to say, "You have to sit and watch the greats for years until you're ready" is incompatible with the values of younger people in 2026, and would be a nail in the coffin for anything calling itself "tango."
They've degenerated into a social.
I know many Hispanophones (granted, not all Argentine) who, when I've asked directly, have told me that the literal translation of milonga in the context of tango is "social" or "dance party," with about equal odds of one answer or the other. I think "milonga = social" is widely accepted. The contrast that still matters is that of milonga vs. baile; both are still "socials" or "dance parties," but the percentage of tango has to be higher for a milonga.
 
Of course I agree with your analysis, JournalInTime. But please, contrary to all sociological evidence and everyday experience, let me slightly exaggerate the importance of the classical milonga vertically?
 
You are describing the experience of a cult initiate. I never bought into the cult and I remember my reaction: For what conceivable reason could these mediocre dancers think they're too good to dance with anyone?
We do not always see eye to eye, but I am with you on this one.

The ritual associated with tango, the idea that it is something "more" than a dance, has never been a part of my identity as a dancer. Tango is just another social/partner dance – like contra or kiz or kompa or salsa or WCS or anything else you dance with somebody else to a relatively narrow genre of music. It has its classic steps and tunes, and an informal dress code simply because social mirroring is a thing, but that's it, that's all.

It gets tiresome being told that the previous paragraph is sad, bad, wrong, offensive to a culture, etc. As an atheist Cartesian thinker, such "being told" provokes almost exactly the same reaction in me that religious proselytizing does! It sets off my cult alert.

It also gets tiresome when it's hinted that if I don't join the cult, perhaps another dance would be better for me. No, I like tango's classic steps, classic tunes, and informal dress code. The biomechanics of the dance agree well with my body type (strong-legged, stable, and unusually flexible), the mathematical progressions of the music agree well with my mind (which "gets" tango music but not, say, salsa music), and the dynamics and geometry of the steps agree well with how my creative mind wants to compose a dance. That's a near-perfect match, and being told to go away because I don't buy into the mysticism is offensive.
 
Today, high-end milongas are rather boring for advanced dancers. But as a beginner, they were incredibly attractive.
My mileage varies. My favourite milonga as a complete beginner who began dancing in them from a ridiculously early stage was one owned by a school and where beginners were welcomed. The high-level ones felt super intimidating, and it took me longer before I dared to cabeceo anyone in those. There was absolutely no breathing in of the atmosphere, I assure you!
 
My favourite milonga as a complete beginner who began dancing in them from a ridiculously early stage was one owned by a school
The idea that there are milongas not owned by schools is the wild part for me! While we've had occasional attempts at such here, they have failed to gain traction due to having neither premises to call their own nor a captive recruiting pool. One endured for a good long while, but it eventually had to relocate to the studio of a school and associate itself with that school to survive, and ultimately it didn't survive. Another few were (are) not milongas at all, but "balls" held a few unpredictable times a year – not weekly. And of course there are the "galas" associated with festivals, plus various marathons and encuentros, none of which are milongas either.

I really hope to travel one day to a place where "studio = school = milonga" isn't true, because I'm itching with curiosity about whether the milongas would really be so different – and if they are different, whether they resemble the balls/galas/marathons/encuentros I know about or some new thing I've never experienced.
 
In London, there are quite a lot of bars with at least halfway decent wooden flooring, in addition to a number of dedicated dance halls. London tango is its own thing, however, which I think makes a much bigger difference than schools versus non-schools. I mostly dance outside the city, although there are a couple of London milongas that are not very London-like.
 
As a rule, a milonga cannot be simultaneously attractive to both beginners and advanced dancers - at least not in a competitive context with limited resources. It is problematic if a milonga designed for beginners (featuring a short duration, short tandas, mixer games, simple music, and no ronda) can only succeed if a large number of "role models" are on hand.
The other way round: many people are drawn to milongas that end up becoming unpleasant for them.
Yes, this is a problem. People who have been dancing for a number of years do not like to dance around beginners. It really throws things off in the ronda. Especially beginning leaders. Of course, it's a problem when the community is trying to grow the size of the Milonga or the number of new dancers. But for beginners, I have always said that the best place to learn, dance, and practice is at a práctica. That's what they were designed for. Prácticas can be very enjoyable, arguably better than a Milonga for those just starting out. And in a few years, they can try out a Milonga to see how they feel. I believe that's the safer and the fairer alternative.
 
Doesn't matter if they cannot dance.
A large contingent of leaders here would tell you that attractive beginner followers are extra-"valuable" to the milonga. These leaders are more than happy to use helping them learn to dance as an excuse to spend time around those followers, and often encourage organizers to bring in such followers, not veterans who are more creep-resistant. I think this is unfortunate and nasty, but answering the question objectively, such people absolutely make milongas with beginner dangers also attractive to some advanced dancers.
 
Interesting. Just the opposite here. None of the milongas are owned or run by schools. We don't really have any tango schools here to speak of. We have instructors but they rent studio space in dance studios for classes and milongas.
We have a few instructors who do that, but relative to instructors at schools, they don't get a lot of business. And quite a few schools have dedicated spaces, whether they own or rent; they are not using shared spaces. These dedicated spaces are where most of the milongas are.
 
Of course it can. All it needs is a critical mass of sufficiently attractive people showing up.
My intended point was that conflicting objectives are unavoidable when organizing a milonga.

I just attended a milonga that featured an upscale atmosphere, live music, tables, and coffee and cake. For some reason, that sort of thing attracts single women and mediocre dancers. In any case, no one from the nearby TangoYoung group was there.
During the live sets, I danced exclusively with my girlfriend and the women from our private workshop group. The DJ wasn't particularly inspiring; some tandas didn't tempt me to dance, while the others were filled with skilled tangueras I knew. I saw quite a few women leaving early.


For what conceivable reason could these mediocre dancers think they're too good to dance with anyone?
I rarely see people who think they are "too good"; I see plenty of people who simply want to dance well.

This applies not just to mediocre dancers, but across all skill levels, from beginners to the advanced. That’s hardly surprising - after all, they are the same people. Tango is a leisure activity, not a philosophy of life; in and of itself, it doesn't turn anyone into a "better person".
The consequences and the level of satisfaction might differ.
 
Or just a good location, night, price, and floor.
The whole scene you describe - ranging from glittering dance studios to a 3:1 gender ratio, is an exception here.
However, an evening milonga in Germany costs around €10, in the Netherlands (where free drinking water dispensers are common) it costs €12.
 

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top