Dear Madmaximus:
I, too, do not subscribe to the concept of "leading" or "following." I use these terms on this discussion board for simplicity and clarity, because that's how everyone else refers to them, but I don't believe in it myself.
As my teacher put it, "leading and following implies dominance and submission," which he says has no place in dancing or in life. He prefers to teach "guiding" or "inviting" and "response," and as you said, BOTH partners are free to invite the other to respond, so that it becomes a balanced partnership, with two people creating something beautiful together, instead of one person giving orders and the other blindly obeying.
Of course, this is much harder. It requires a higher level of connection, of listening, and responsiveness. It requires awareness and thinking. But my best dances have been with partners who gently invite me to do something, and I respond, and counter with an invitation of my own, rather than him insisting on dictating what we do, he responds to my invitation, then issues a new invitation. It becomes a conversation, rather than a speech, with each partner listening and responding to the other. It opens the door to so much creativity.
A lot of men have discovered to their chagrin that I do not follow, and if a guy insists on leading, he'll find I can get pretty mule-y and uncooperative, and that I am anything but a dishrag dancer. Those dances usually end with me being as mad at him for being a pig, as he is with me for being a stubborn mule. But if an man asks me nicely, I can be one of the most responsive, tender partners he could ask for.
Renee
I, too, do not subscribe to the concept of "leading" or "following." I use these terms on this discussion board for simplicity and clarity, because that's how everyone else refers to them, but I don't believe in it myself.
As my teacher put it, "leading and following implies dominance and submission," which he says has no place in dancing or in life. He prefers to teach "guiding" or "inviting" and "response," and as you said, BOTH partners are free to invite the other to respond, so that it becomes a balanced partnership, with two people creating something beautiful together, instead of one person giving orders and the other blindly obeying.
Of course, this is much harder. It requires a higher level of connection, of listening, and responsiveness. It requires awareness and thinking. But my best dances have been with partners who gently invite me to do something, and I respond, and counter with an invitation of my own, rather than him insisting on dictating what we do, he responds to my invitation, then issues a new invitation. It becomes a conversation, rather than a speech, with each partner listening and responding to the other. It opens the door to so much creativity.
A lot of men have discovered to their chagrin that I do not follow, and if a guy insists on leading, he'll find I can get pretty mule-y and uncooperative, and that I am anything but a dishrag dancer. Those dances usually end with me being as mad at him for being a pig, as he is with me for being a stubborn mule. But if an man asks me nicely, I can be one of the most responsive, tender partners he could ask for.
Renee