You forget that these were PRIVATE lessons. It was an analogy to help my partner with his rather abrupt movement. Its possible that Oscar has never mentioned this to any other dancers but us. (unlikely, but possible) I hardly claimed it was his fallback teaching method that he expects of everyone who crosses his path and he spends 1/2 of a workshop talking esoterically.
As a tool and metaphor to help my partner smooth out his lead, it was genius. Expansion and contraction of movement (not the embrace, itself) are useful elements for a smooth and musical dance. It's fairly natural to coordinate the expansion and contraction of breathing with those movements, but if someone doesn't make use of the principle in their movement or their breathing, the whole dance feels stiff and jerky.
I love it when people move the goalposts!
Making someone conscious of their intrusive breathing is a very
different situation from your fist post. Hopefully that helped to make
your partner more aware of the need to breathe in synchronicity
with the dance. His problem was the opposite of the one which gets
teachers saying "and breathe" when someone isn't.
Disparage away if you like, but I think you missed the point.
Well no, actually. Your original point was the one I rather disagreed with. Like this one -
Actually, I've been taught the "inhale to signal" thing. It sort of works, at least as a starting point. It's all part of preparing yourself and your partner to move.
- though the preparation part can be useful.
As in many things, it's a question of degree. Someone gets or is given
an idea and then it gets extended until it is given an importance way
beyond reason.
Peaches has given a very good explanation - as I said it's personal,
individual and not contrived. In other words you don't use your breathing
to give a signal but breathing can influence your signals and the
atmosphere of your dance. It can be intrusive and disruptive,
as in the case of Zoopsia's partner, or complementary and engaging
as per Peaches.