bastet
Active Member
IMO, the follower needs to be able to disassociate, for it to work well (of course, so does the leader).
that is my understanding also.
Ask questions, meet dancers, and be part of the conversation.
IMO, the follower needs to be able to disassociate, for it to work well (of course, so does the leader).
Yes, the few times that I tried parallel with a partner, on her left, the hips, legs seemed to clash on that closed side.Just imagining this right now without trying it, I'd say cross system will be more comfortable and parallel would be a booger.
Yes, the few times that I tried parallel with a partner, on her left, the hips, legs seemed to clash on that closed side.
Ricardo Vidort is THE master at this. Here he goes there at 24 sec into the song.
My experience is that the leader has to manage his head differently
when on the closed or left hand side of his partner as the head positioning
is now much more awkward. I'll have to try and remember to pay
attention to this tonight and report back if I've anything relevant and helpful to say.
Right now all I can say is I'm sure I was taught to turn my
head towards my partner, in other words to my left. Whether I've now
evolved a different technique more in line with what you've posted I'll
have to see..
Well, actually, not really. It is the follower's responsibility to dissociate just as much as it is the lead's responsibility to do the same. She's got to keep her orientation towards the leader the same, and if he's walking outside partner than in order to do that she's got to change the angle of her shoulders/upper body relative to her hips. She's also got to be flexible enough in the embrace to allow for any sorts of shifts that do happen. And, she needs to understand how to follow when his-n-hers shoulders are angled differently than the direction she's being asked to step.Her responsibility is NOTHING. She needs to walk (backwards) normally, and all of the adjusting is on you, the lead. You should do this to the point that she should not (drastically) be able to tell the difference. It needs to happen seamlessly, and smoothly.
Its all on you.
Not true in the least. I have had leaders walk outside partner to my left, while in a V embrace, plenty of times. It takes lots of dissociation, and a slight adjustment of our positions relative to each other (I "slide" slightly to my right/his left.), but it is extremely possible. Granted, I suppose it also depends on how open the right side is in your idea of a V embrace...JohnEm said:By definition you cannot walk on your partner's left in the V-embrace.
Well, actually, not really. It is the follower's responsibility to dissociate just as much as it is the lead's responsibility to .....
I have no idea what you mean by "stable" versus "unstable" positions. In theory, both should be pretty stable over their feet and balanced in their actions, regardless of what's going on. (Exceptions being made, of course, for times when that is very deliberately not the case--colgadas, volcadas and the like.)I would have thought that the followers dissociation comes about as a result of the leaders and the follower is following normally.
I have always found that the followers greater concentration is to maintain her walk as normal as possible to give the leader as much statbility as she can because he is in the more unstable positon.
Hmm... I'm having trouble working this out in my head without a partner. I'll have to report back as well. My feeling is that by turning your head more to your left, she has to turn hers and that makes her want to walk backwards on a curve...which would work well if you are TRYING to curve (to your left.. ie:CCW) But if you are trying to go straight down LOD, it will make it harder (or at least less likely) for her to step straight back... I think... need a partner to try it out..
Oh yes!I think the biggest thing making it awkward though is just that so many people dance with the follower offset to the leader's right. Its a lot harder to get around her on that side if she's already further to your right than you are!
Oh yes!
Peaches says it works though she qualifies that by saying the embrace
has to be loosened/changed. I would add, changed a lot so I don't attempt
it with people who dance like that. I often find too that V-embrace people
have strong arms and that rigidity can be uncomfortable and restricting.
It's piss-poor technique is what it is.
If it's a matter of what teacher they learned from, then it's a matter of either the teacher not conveying the requisite information, or the student not paying attention.
Thanks for reporting back. Ok, one cannot practice this walk alone but, in my case, I have to. So, when I move onto the woman's left side I rotate my chest (and head) to the left and mentally picture her's as following the disassociation. I had heretofore been holding my left shoulder back while keeping my head looking down the LOD..I guess I have to turn it with my chest as a unit and sort of peek out the right corner of my eyes?When I change walking on the open side to the closed side it is accompanied by a disassociating rotation of both upper bodies approximately 90deg anticlockwise
or to the left. There is no significant change in the chest to chest relationship nor in the relationship of the heads..
Thanks for reporting back. Ok, one cannot practice this walk alone but, in my case, I have to. So, when I move onto the woman's left side I rotate my chest (and head) to the left and mentally picture her's as following the disassociation. I had heretofore been holding my left shoulder back while keeping my head looking down the LOD..I guess I have to turn it with my chest as a unit and sort of peek out the right corner of my eyes?
As a coincidence, this morning I was thinking that my head may be unconsciously tilting forward when I walk. I realize that this does not look good but how else does this flaw hurt in this situation? thks