To be a "student" you may not teach at all in any way.In NDCA lingo, student means Pro-Am student. And so, by extension, non-student amateur means any amateur who does not dance Pro-Am.
You can remain an "am" even if you teach some amount. You have to read the rules though. I don't quite understand them. But there is a weird status between "student am" and "pro". I know Kye Rivers (grand son of Ray Rivers, nephew of Tony Redpath, son of Matt Rivers) dances as the "not student" but still "am" with people he teaches. They can NOT enter things like "pro-am scholarship" because he's not a "pro", but he's also not a "student Am" because he teaches in some sense. But he is not a "pro". And his students can't enter the "pro -am " scholarships of championships, but they can be 'in' the competition.
There are rules-- I just don't quite know them. No one stays in that limbo for long.
Yes. Something like that. As a student Am, I don't worry about it.Which sounds like a pretty silly distinction, on its face, but it actually does make sense.
Pro-Am students are more heavily restricted in the scope of dance activities they can engage in while maintaining good standing, including a total ban on receiving any amount of money for teaching or performing. In exchange, they get access to the Pro-Am system, with all of its benefits.
Non-Student Amateurs, by contrast, are almost completely unrestricted. They can get as much money from teaching and performing as they want. Really, the only thing they cannot do is declare themselves Pro at a contest, then change their mind and dance Amateur again later. In exchange for that freedom, there are comparatively fewer benefits and less support, including prize money.
Yes. And IF they have a student who wants to participate in a competitoin, the student also can't compete for the purses when they compete with the "not-student Am" teacher.I haven't confirmed this with anyone, but my take is that these rules are structured the way they are to avoid a scenario where a de facto pro couple (i.e., one that completes at an elite level, earns their living by teaching dance & dancing with their students in mixed amateur) enters either Student-Student or Pro-Am events (with one of them declaring pro and the other not), and scooping up prize purses in an underhanded way. And so we have two classes of amateur, where the one with more access to prize purses is more heavily restricted.
Yes. I don't worry about it. But under 21 people who want to teach a little but also still compete under 21 Am do keep track of it. Then they can potentially be the "under 21 am " winner, but also make a little money. It's a bit harder to get $$$$ paying students because a lot of students want to compete "pro-am" and be able to get "the prize" or "the scholarship money"....and with a healthy helping of confusion to go with it!
I'm fuzzy on the exact rules. But it's a path that lets you dancers make a little money but still compete Am.



