Drama at the Studio - Opinions

I understand. Where I live, accredited trainers could do whatever they wanted if they were successful. They were courted by studios and clubs and were allowed to have privates in the studio and elsewhere.

Likely, "what they wanted" wasn't to live in some rural out of the way location in the US!
 
I don't think this is workable.

First: I don't want to study in a group. I want private lessons. (But honestly, your idea wouldn't work even if I wanted group lessons.)

Second, if the trainer works at a studio, he's likely bound by a non-compete while working there. The studio could not only fire them but also seize any earnings obtained in violation of the no compete.
Even if they are not under a non-compete, the studio can fire them for teaching outside the studio. So I wouldn't be able to hire a trainer who works at that studio to come give me private lessons or organize a regular 2 hour group lesson.

Third: the entire problem is in some parts of the country, the are very few to no independent trainers. The reason is there are insufficient number of clients. So the only trainers around work for the only studio around. If independent trainers existed (as they do in the Chicago area), I would have no difficulty.


I think you are in Europe. I suspect you truly don't grasp the idea of "living in the middle of nowhere" because Europeans often don't grasp that. There is a lot of "middle of nowhere" in the US. But if I were to even get as far away from Chicago as, say "Morris, Il", I would likely have a difficult time getting a good teacher who taught the dance style I want to learn within a 1-2 hour drive of my home.
Yet Morris is only 1 h 40 minutes from Chicago, and traffic looks fairly bad right now as I mapped that. Sorry, I lived in Chicagoland for most of my life, and my first reaction was "Morris isn't that far out there."

Now that I live in Virginia, I find it very sad that the Chicago area doesn't have any chapters of USA Dance.
 
I understand. Where I live, accredited trainers could do whatever they wanted if they were successful. They were courted by studios and clubs and were allowed to have privates in the studio and elsewhere.
In your examples, those trainers are not contractual employees with studios. We have some like these in the US, but just not a lot.
 
Now that I live in Virginia, I find it very sad that the Chicago area doesn't have any chapters of USA Dance.
I thought... don't they? I think they used to. I never joined.

But I see these at the chapter listing, so I guess not

Illinois
2039 Northern IL serves the area of Rockford
2047 Quad City IL serves the areas of Rock Island & Moline IL; Davenport IA and surrounding communities

I'm pretty sure they existed-- but maybe they fell apart during Covid? That killed lots of things that weren't thriving.

Yet Morris is only 1 h 40 minutes from Chicago, and traffic looks fairly bad right now as I mapped that. Sorry, I lived in Chicagoland for most of my life, and my first reaction was "Morris isn't that far out there."
1 hour 40 minuts there and 1 hour 40 minutes back is a long way to drive for lessons. There are some people who would do it. But those aren't people stopping by a franchise and looking for entry level lessons. It would be difficult to dedicate 3 hours and 20 minutes just to driving back and forth when what you want is to take a 45 minute entry level or intermediate lessons. Most people have jobs, family and so on.
 
Hope you don't mind a bit of a slide away from the OP topic.

We've been having lessons with a local dance instructor, very good indeed and have been attending privates and groups lessons with her for 3 years. She's a competitive dance instructor and has been very successful and is a very busy instructor. Very informal and approachable, she unfortunately doesn't have a regular studio, so it's sometimes a challenge to arrange lessons, studio, hall availability etc. Along with her commitments to her competitive students and events are also a factor.

Anyway, never looked at dance studio's per se, we have now.....the rules along with the can can't do's

Copied from one studio's T & C's

Prohibition of Personal Communication with Dance Instructors.

The Client agrees not to engage in any personal communication with Dance Instructors.

We've only been dancing 3-4 years and only know one other local friendly studio.

This is a whole new aspect of instruction that we never even knew existed. Of course understand why, protection of business income etc.

Feels a bit impersonal and very far removed from how it's been.

Anyway, thanks for reading!
 
...book...
'Booking' will, in some legislatures, be construed as a 'contract' (I'm not a lawyer, but I'll include the disclaimer to seek appropriate legal advice! A verbal contract isn't worth the paper it's written on! - Mayer, co-founder of MGM). If you're booking through a studio then you're likely entering a contract - even unwritten. And that can apply in reverse - like the floor was poorly prepared for purpose so you slipped/wrenched your knee but you had a 'contract' with them to expect a suitable environment. Depends how litigious that group is!

When we have private lessons with some teachers we've also had to sign a disclaimer for health, injury, etc - and contracted to pay. Never had one regarding personal communication, but I guess in today's world both parties may seek privacy and protection (from stalking?). There are creeps around!
 
If said teacher is an independent contractor, (and it sounds like she is) you shouldn't be held to any studio rules. Do you pay the teacher directly? That said, be careful. This is one area that when I was looking for a new teacher/studio I specifically asked about because as an advanced competitive student dancing pro am, I felt like it is important to get to know my teacher in order to trust them and be vulnerable enough to make enough progress in my own dancing.
 
Only had privates on the black side, and I had quite a lot. Even studio owners prefer informal collaboration.
Depends on the legislature, the nature of the 'studio', and the nature of the 'black economy' where you are. Also how litigious clients are, or suspected of being. I've come across both options, but more formal from one with experience of the US. Possibly different where it's another side-hustle. Maybe some clients want to ensure they're not stalked, or worse, and studio feels the need for a 'duty of care'. There have been cases which justify that 'privacy'. People are a problem!
 
Can't you book exclusively privates on a random basis without signing a contract?
It's not that easy, because these sorts of under-the-table deals preclude meeting the teacher in their studio. And for ballroom dances that travel, especially, it is difficult to find an appropriately-sized and -equipped space outside of a studio.

Not to mention the fact that the dance community is not that large and everyone knows each other. So even supposing you do find an appropriate neutral spot to meet a teacher for lessons, it is only too easy for word of the meeting to get out, and then the teacher might be in trouble for violating the terms of their employment. So not only can you not meet in their studio, you probably can't meet in any nearby studio!
 
So not only can you not meet in their studio, you probably can't meet in any nearby studio!
I was going to say precisely this. Unless you meet in your own living room, getting lessons on the sly is going to be difficult. The teacher will almost certainly be caught and likely fired. Depending on the non-compete contract, the consequences for the teacher may be worse.

Sadly, while independent contractors technically can work for themselves, it's not clear the studio a teacher worked for would remain in a voluntary association with them if the studio felt the teacher poached clients. The studio may not be able to "fire" them-- because they aren't employees-- but there is nothing that says either has to continue with a contract the find not beneficial. The studio can cancel the contract often for nearly any reason. I can't help but think they would do so.

Heck.... well... I could talk about what can be the 'reality' for 1099 contractors affiliated with studios. It's not necessarily dissimilar to the 'reality' for 1099 contractors on now common apps and so on.

For the student? The studio might ban you. But regardless of contract, you remain a potential source of $revenue$. So they might talk to you and "forgive" you.
 
Last edited:
If said teacher is an independent contractor, (and it sounds like she is) you shouldn't be held to any studio rules. Do you pay the teacher directly? That said, be careful. This is one area that when I was looking for a new teacher/studio I specifically asked about because as an advanced competitive student dancing pro am, I felt like it is important to get to know my teacher in order to trust them and be vulnerable enough to make enough progress in my own dancing.
I just reread my post and realized it sounded like I meant to be careful if you pay them directly. That is not what I meant. That is ok depending on individual situations. I meant be careful when encountering all those fraternization rules.
 
..the teacher might be in trouble for violating the terms of their employment..
The teachers I had privates with (in BR, salsa, tango) were always at the height of their success and didn't need to be hired by a studio. They traveled the continent, skimming the cream. Studio owners were always grateful and subservient when such a star showed up.
 

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top