The quote sounds like some old guy with instrument envy. Or someone too set in what they know to try something new.
Most artists, however, are always playing around with new techniques and themes. At the same time we are also getting on with the serious business of perfecting our conventional skills and repertoires so that we can earn money to pay for food and rent and so on.
Artistic experiments by their nature usually fail. We go on to the next experiment. Which occasionally was inspired by some small good aspect of a failure. So idea begets idea begets idea. And eventually we achieve something that we want to show off, and get reactions from our public. Many of whom will hate, or more often be left cold by, our efforts. We can ignore the negative reactions. Or sometimes learn something useful from them. Maybe someone hated most, but not all, of the experimental side of what we've shown, which might be a painting, a musical performance, a film or sculpture or whatever.
Electronic musical instruments have evolved much from their beginnings. They are old hat nowadays. Performers and composers know all about how to use them. They have all the advantages of conventional instruments and, the expensive ones, none of the disadvantages - except expense! They can put out any sound a conventional instrument can, and so well that human ears no matter how good or skilled can tell the difference. The crap in the publicity quote that Ampster gave us ("warm acoustic" versus "cool electronic") is nearly a century out of date.
Electronic instruments usually have keyboards, but they can also be controlled by strings and breath and drum heads and so on. So why doesn't every professional musician use, say, electric guitars? Because (among other reasons) the technology behind acoustic guitars is mature and sophisticated. It may be thought of as low-tech but it is not. It is very high-tech but its nature is hidden from most of us because the evolution of acoustic guitars has simplified their use and their construction enormously, and most of us confuse complicated with advanced. The reverse is true.
That's the instrument side of the topic of "new tango music" subject.
__________________________________________________
Musicians and other artists experiment not only with our tools, but also our technique. A lot of the objections to "neotango" comes from these experiments.
One technique is the presentation of rhythms. How much can musicians diverge from the steady walking beat behind the Argentine tango?
One way is to give you both a slow-slow and quick-quick rhythms in the same piece of music, either alternating the rhythms or overlaying them. This lets dancers choose which rhythm to use, and lets them switch back and forth between the two. Here is an example of one of my favorite performing couples, Mariana and Sebastian, dancing in SEVERAL rhythms to Otros Aires' "Sin Rumbo."
www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFB8Lqwh-sI
"Sin Rumbo" is a good example of complex rhythmic expression. The first 20+ seconds the bandoneon plays a staccato slow-slow basic tango rhythm. Then its joined by the percussion section playing in quick-quick rhythm. Later on the percussion becomes quieter and the slow-slow rhythm audibly dominates. (Incidentally, if you listen closely you can tell that the piano also is contributing to the two rhythms.)
__________________________________________________
I suppose the bottom line to this discussion is a point several others have made in this thread. Tango has been evolving since its inception.
The use of various instruments is a good example. The first tango bands used portable instruments, often a guitar, drum, maybe a violin, and a whistle. The bandoneon, being small and light and versatile, was an early addition to tango bands, but it was not terribly important for a number of years because its frame was too fragile for it to be played loudly. Changing to a metal frame allowed the bandoneon to become a full member of tango bands.
Dance technique has also seen a lot of experimentation, but in the end I find it interesting that much of it is eventually abandoned by even its most ardent practitioners. Underneath, somehow, a unified tango seems to exist that will stay the same no matter how much the future enhances, but does not change, that essential core.
Laer Carroll -
ShapechangerTales.com