Ethics and Switching Partners

Multiple Choices: Ethics and Changing Partners

  • Yes, it is ethical to have a try-out behind my partner's back.

    Votes: 7 22.6%
  • No, I think it is not ethical to have a try-out without my partner's knowledge.

    Votes: 10 32.3%
  • If I had a chance with a really good partner, I would go behind my partner's back.

    Votes: 6 19.4%
  • If I had a chance with a really good partner. I would split up first, before having a tryout.

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • If approached, I would do it without my partner's knowledge.

    Votes: 3 9.7%
  • If approached, I would let my partner know first.

    Votes: 13 41.9%
  • If approached, I would not know what to do.

    Votes: 6 19.4%

  • Total voters
    31
Even with the additional background, I still don't feel the FNC did anything wrong. He approached a woman with whom he was interested in dancing and asked if she'd be interested. It's not the FNC's duty to ask the male partner if he can ask the woman to dance with him.

What if the female partner wanted to dance with the FNC, and the male partner had been approached for permission and told the FNC he couldn't ask because he didn't want to lose his partner?
 
Joe said:
Even with the additional background, I still don't feel the FNC did anything wrong. He approached a woman with whom he was interested in dancing and asked if she'd be interested. It's not the FNC's duty to ask the male partner if he can ask the woman to dance with him.

What if the female partner wanted to dance with the FNC, and the male partner had been approached for permission and told the FNC he couldn't ask because he didn't want to lose his partner?
I agree.
It's often worth asking, some partnerships are "doomed" and both partners agree on that, but they look fine from the outside. It's only after talking to one or both partners that one can learn that.
 
Until you ask, you don't know. Either partner, or both may just be biding their time until someone else comes along.
 
Actually, it sounds to me like FNC might have just dodged a bullet there. If she is a) immature enough not to be willing to apologize for hurting her good friend and b) so uncommitted to dancing that she quit because one partnership ended, then he may be better off with another partner.

I agree that FNC didn't do anything wrong by asking (unless he was close friends with them both and knew in detail what their commitment to the partnership was). In any relationship, there will be outside challenges, everything from schedule difficulties to someone making a pass at a married person. It's up the the members of the relationship to enforce its boundaries and say "no" to things that threaten the relationship.

I do have some sympathy for the lady. How could you pass up a try-out with an FNC? And I can understand not wanting to tell your current partner if you weren't sure the new one would work out, because of the possible emotional complications of just having the try-out. It's sort of like, you don't tell your boss you're going on another interview. You tell him when you get the other job. And maybe she read him right--he did respond pretty dramatically, by quitting dancing altogether. It's easy to say in retrospect he would have been happy for her, but how would he really have felt over time dancing with someone he knew had tried to dump him?

That said, once she made a choice on how she was going to handle it, she had a ethical obligation to make that choice work. Either:

a) be open from the beginning

b) keep the first tryout a secret--really a secret. That means, not being seen at a comp in ballroom hold with FNC, having the tryout somewhere they wouldn't be seen by other ballroomers, and, once she had determined that she wasn't going to go with the new partnership, keeping her mouth shut for eternity.

As far as I'm concerned, it's the half-a$$ed way she handled it that caused all the trouble. And she certainly should have apologized for hurting her partner. Even if she felt it was OK to do the try-out, even if she felt that she was perhaps protecting the partnership by not telling him beforehand about something that was just a possibility, she should be sorry that she hurt him.
 
I guess you could also blame the FNC for the halfassed way he also handled the tryouts. He's just as responsible for secrecy, which he should have realized was of the essense in such situations.
 
true...but FNC has no relationship to whether or not anything can now be salvaged and so while it may make it easier to mend fences if a large portion of blame be given to the FNC...the respnsibility for what has happened to the partnership, is entirely upon the two who were in it...IMO...and it is of no use to ponder the FNC anymore...only to ponder why these two friends can't be friends anymore...that is up to them, if that is not salvagable, that lies squarely on both their shoulders IMO
 

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top