raindance
Forum Master
@Cal I enjoy reading your posts, and I really hope you continue to post here whenever you have something to add.
PNP - I thought we were all just trying to figure out what you were describing, and how that related to how we thought about mambo. Partly because we all like to type about dancing for some reason (or we wouldn't be on DF) and partly to maybe try to help you think of other ways to view the new/updated info from your lesson. I don't think anyone was trying to imply your instructor doesn't know what he is doing.
From my own limited experience with rhythm, one of my frustrations with the style 10+ years ago was that there were a number of opinions on what was "correct" technique, and not much agreement amongst the experts (coaches, judges, etc), each of whom thought they knew the "one true way." And then if the judging panel at a comp had mostly smooth or latin judges (instead of rhythm focused judges) there were even more opinions about what good rhythm dancing should look like. It all felt too loosey goosey for my liking, and it's one of the reasons I didn't end up focusing on rhythm. (Which also means I didn't study it intensely of course.) Maybe that's changed through the years since I last took lessons, maybe it hasn't, I don't know.
All I mean by that long paragraph is that would not surprise me if the most favored technique for any aspect of a rhythm dance has changed (again) over time. Perhaps back to one of the techniques I was briefly exposed to, or perhaps in a different direction.
Or perhaps there are still the same competing schools of thought, and your pro has become convinced that (some aspects of) a different way of thinking about things is currently the best way to go. Or perhaps he is just giving you another level of technique that feels foreign to you at the moment but will become second nature over time.
Others of course really love rhythm and will disagree with some or all of my comments, and that's fine, of course.
PNP - I thought we were all just trying to figure out what you were describing, and how that related to how we thought about mambo. Partly because we all like to type about dancing for some reason (or we wouldn't be on DF) and partly to maybe try to help you think of other ways to view the new/updated info from your lesson. I don't think anyone was trying to imply your instructor doesn't know what he is doing.
From my own limited experience with rhythm, one of my frustrations with the style 10+ years ago was that there were a number of opinions on what was "correct" technique, and not much agreement amongst the experts (coaches, judges, etc), each of whom thought they knew the "one true way." And then if the judging panel at a comp had mostly smooth or latin judges (instead of rhythm focused judges) there were even more opinions about what good rhythm dancing should look like. It all felt too loosey goosey for my liking, and it's one of the reasons I didn't end up focusing on rhythm. (Which also means I didn't study it intensely of course.) Maybe that's changed through the years since I last took lessons, maybe it hasn't, I don't know.
All I mean by that long paragraph is that would not surprise me if the most favored technique for any aspect of a rhythm dance has changed (again) over time. Perhaps back to one of the techniques I was briefly exposed to, or perhaps in a different direction.
Or perhaps there are still the same competing schools of thought, and your pro has become convinced that (some aspects of) a different way of thinking about things is currently the best way to go. Or perhaps he is just giving you another level of technique that feels foreign to you at the moment but will become second nature over time.
Others of course really love rhythm and will disagree with some or all of my comments, and that's fine, of course.