Maurizio and Melinda Split

[Becca]

Slavik and Anna will dance for Russia, it says so on the WDC website.

I need to book my UK Open tickets fast! I had pretty rubbish seats for the evening last year, but at least I was on the front row all through the daytime sessions. Definitely will book within the next month!

 

[bookworm]

Sorry for the mis-information(sp?) about Anna and Slavik at the Aussies.
Our ticketing website (ticketek.com.au) still has them as performing. However the official website for the Aussies has Melinda and Andrej as performing.
~sigh~

 

[contracheck]

Thanks for trying to help out paspopaul.

Just so you know, and just so our standards here are clear, in our efforts to keep DF free of unsubstantiade gossip, innuendo, and speculation we generally prohibit posting and discussions in the absence of any public announcements. In this case the website announcing a performance constitutes public advertising for the partnership in question, which more than suffices.

I take this opportunity to propose that the Guidelines should be revised to allow posting PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS in addition to PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS. As I understand, you're in schorary business. If you look at some of the world most prestigious publications, such as Science amd Nature,they allow to use PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS as legitimate references in addition to the ususal published references. If we are permitted to read only PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS, we miss a lot of valuable information. Pasopaul's post is a good example. Posters in this site are responsible people, and they are notlikely post false gossips, innunedoes and rumors at the expense of damaging their credibility.

 

[etp777]

Contracheck, the issue is that too often "personal communications" that people are relaying is something they've heard from friend, or friend of friend, whatever, rather than the actual people in question. PLus there's considerations that they might have wanted the conversation to be private, even if they didn't make that clear. And not pointing fingers, as I've been guilty of relaying something I heard from a friend on here too.

 

[contracheck]

Contracheck, the issue is that too often "personal communications" that people are relaying is something they've heard from friend, or friend of friend, whatever, rather than the actual people in question. PLus there's considerations that they might have wanted the conversation to be private, even if they didn't make that clear. And not pointing fingers, as I've been guilty of relaying something I heard from a friend on here too.

Trust the posters integrity. There may be some risk by allowing posting personal communications, but the benefit outweighs the risk. Don't you think that some of these world most prestigeous publications don't worry about those negative aspects you indicated? When I obtain some valuable info from a source other than public announcements, and when I am sure of that the public would benefit from my info, I had to use all kinds of unnecessary cryptic manuver to evade the censor.

 

[dlgodud]

Is this official? Then, it seems a good match.