fascination
Site Moderator
this may be b/c I am a pro/ammer...but let's not go there....but I had an observation abut my progress of late that I guess I wanted to toss out there...more and more my results mean less b/c I can clearly and concretely delineate the ways in which I have improved and I can honestly say that I can comprehend what it is I need to do to execute a step and I am responsbile for practicing that until I can see that it is better...
not long ago, I complimented a friend on what I saw was some improvement in her dancing and she said "really?"...she wasn't at all certain that it was better nor could she have told me what it was that I was thinking was better....I think this is mainly b/c her time to practice is limited so most progress is quite gradual and a result of her lessons ....I was struck by the fact that her progress would be less spotty and at a steeper trajectory if she actually knew why it was better and what was better and how to do it again...and I remember when I was in that space...I only had a vague notion that I had improved somewhat and could only vaguely tell someone why...but I could almost never be as specifc about how as I am now...and I think the difference is degree of information that I am getting and the increased amount of time by neccessity that I have to work on it alone...and I know of one other very successful pro-ammer who has gotten there in precisely the same way....
do you think there is merit to that notion and that it is a big part of what separates good from very good?
not long ago, I complimented a friend on what I saw was some improvement in her dancing and she said "really?"...she wasn't at all certain that it was better nor could she have told me what it was that I was thinking was better....I think this is mainly b/c her time to practice is limited so most progress is quite gradual and a result of her lessons ....I was struck by the fact that her progress would be less spotty and at a steeper trajectory if she actually knew why it was better and what was better and how to do it again...and I remember when I was in that space...I only had a vague notion that I had improved somewhat and could only vaguely tell someone why...but I could almost never be as specifc about how as I am now...and I think the difference is degree of information that I am getting and the increased amount of time by neccessity that I have to work on it alone...and I know of one other very successful pro-ammer who has gotten there in precisely the same way....
do you think there is merit to that notion and that it is a big part of what separates good from very good?