Other examples of why I roll my eyes somewhat at these ballots as an overall concept:
- On one of my smooth ballots, there was no plus sign by "poise/posture," but the written comment was "great poise." This means that the absence of a plus sign by any particular element doesn't mean that said element isn't deserving of a plus sign. Hmm. OK.
- In a different smooth heat (where I got 2 ballots), one ballot had a plus sign next to "heel leads" and the other had a minus sign next to "heel leads." Hmm. OK. Same dance, same heat - but different judges.
- On another smooth ballot, there was no minus sign by "heel leads," but the written comment was "watch heels." This means that the absence of a minus sign by any particular element doesn't mean that said element doesn't need improvement. Hmm. OK.
Nonetheless, there were some consistent and probably reliable indicators of strengths and weaknesses, such as these:
- the judges marked plus signs next to "Movement: Traveling" on 14 of my 19 smooth ballots (the next highest total of plus signs on my smooth ballots for any single element was only 7, for "Dance Positions: Connection" and also for "Arm Styling: Dynamics").
- my smooth ballots included 5 minus signs but zero plus signs for "Footwork: brushing action" (including all 4 smooth dances).
- even worse, under smooth Footwork (including all 3 subcategories), there were 16 minus signs total and only 5 plus signs. Definitive? Nah. An indication of an area that needs attention? Definitely.
- on my rhythm ballots, 26 of my total plus signs were all in the category of Presentation: animation (7), dance character (7), & musicality (12)....
- ...as opposed to only 12 plus signs in rhythm for Arm Styling: arm position (1), arm articulation (6), & dynamics (5).
Is it news to me that my musicality, animation, and overall performance skills are pretty good, and definitely better than my arm styling skills? No, of course not. But it's still useful to see concrete numbers like these, even though it's a small data set.
It WAS eye-opening to me, not necessarily in a good way, to see these general totals:
| Style | Total # of Plus Signs | Total # of Minus Signs: |
| Rhythm (22 ballots) | 71 | 26 |
| Smooth (19 ballots) | 50 | 28 |
If I wanted to overthink, I'd wonder if this means any of the following:
- rhythm is easier than smooth; or
- I look better dancing rhythm than smooth; or
- my pro looks better dancing rhythm than smooth; or
- I dance rhythm better than I dance smooth; or
- my pro dances rhythm better than he dances smooth; or
- these judges like rhythm better than they like smooth; or
- these judges judge smooth more harshly than they judge rhythm; or
- smooth heats were in the morning and rhythm heats were after lunch, so the judges were in a better mood in the afternoon & feeling more generous with their comments
Without spending too terribly much time on those musings, I'd conclude "nope, those numbers alone probably don't signify anything."
RHYTHM HEATS:
SMOOTH HEATS:
Final note: the ballots don't identify the judges. If a judge has distinctive handwriting AND happens to write multiple-word comments on more than one of your ballots, you might be able to say "these two ballots were from the same judge." But it's trickier to figure that out if all you have to work with is some random scribblings of plus and minus signs. But ultimately, I don't need to know those specifics to obtain useful information from the ballots, so it's OK.