newbie
Well-Known Member
I went to the CITA desk (CITA is an A.T festival in Buenos Aires, I attended the 7th edition in March) and asked for a taxi-dancer (taxi-mujer, in this case) for four classes where I did not want to see all the nice teaching ruined by a fat, unskilled, assertive follower. Well, no, most probably I felt unsure about my own abilities for these classes ( three intermediates and even one advanced) and thought I would probably need an helpful partner.
Each day I got a different girl, but basically they were all very similar:
A flexible body, making effortless hips/shoulders twists,
Axis and independent balance, never using me as a support,
Instant reaction time for following (whatever I may lead) and adjusting (to my changing the abrazo, or making larger steps…),
Never anticipating anything,
During giros, stepping on the beat and with evenly-sized steps.
While in the classes I liked very much these partners, because I could concentrate on my own mistakes, as they were making none. Also they were patient and supportive. Yet they were clearly not outstanding, they were just flawless. Neither elegant like Lorena (Ermocida) nor playful like Alejandra (Arrue).
And now I’m wondering why all the followers can’t be like this. All the aforementioned qualities are nothing special after all, and should be the standard requirements of the random follower, the “ground zero” of tango skills for any woman who has been taking A.T. classes for one year. Yet, out of my nine usual partners (and who have from one to ten years of experience in A.T), four would fail the first item, and six would fail the second.
Each day I got a different girl, but basically they were all very similar:
A flexible body, making effortless hips/shoulders twists,
Axis and independent balance, never using me as a support,
Instant reaction time for following (whatever I may lead) and adjusting (to my changing the abrazo, or making larger steps…),
Never anticipating anything,
During giros, stepping on the beat and with evenly-sized steps.
While in the classes I liked very much these partners, because I could concentrate on my own mistakes, as they were making none. Also they were patient and supportive. Yet they were clearly not outstanding, they were just flawless. Neither elegant like Lorena (Ermocida) nor playful like Alejandra (Arrue).
And now I’m wondering why all the followers can’t be like this. All the aforementioned qualities are nothing special after all, and should be the standard requirements of the random follower, the “ground zero” of tango skills for any woman who has been taking A.T. classes for one year. Yet, out of my nine usual partners (and who have from one to ten years of experience in A.T), four would fail the first item, and six would fail the second.