cornutt said:
I think that's typical. You don't know until you receive the papers. When I divorced my first wife, it took three weeks after the divorce was final before I got the paperwork. They don't bother to tell anyone.
And I think that it sucks that the judge, having taken that much time, couldn't wait a few more days before signing the papers. That means you'll have to file as single on your takes this year.

Sorry about that.
Actually, filing as single is better than "married filing separately". Filing jointly would have been out of the question because 1) our finances have been completely separate since end of December 2004, and 2) we were deadlocked for more than half the year before we could arrive at an agreement over splitting the refund checks.
Here's the story:
The divorce was filed on 28 Dec and some time after that my copy was sent to my lawyer's. In his office it's just him and his secretary. His secretary's father has been very ill for the past few years battling cancer and he died at about the time they received my copy, so she was out-of-state dealing with that. Apparently, they both thought that the other had taken care of notifying me and I got dropped through the cracks.
The way I finally found out was first thing Monday morning when I kept my doctor's appointment and they informed me that my coverage had been terminated (she had always carried me on her insurance because I changed jobs more often than she). That leaves me without coverage, but our HR person was able to talk HQ into getting me on their plan immediately, so I should have coverage in a few days.
Now here's the weird thing that I still don't understand. In talking with so many people who had been going through a divorce, most of them had an effective date, usually a month or two in the future, when the divorce would become final. And yet my case and a few others was that it would become final as soon as the judge signed it and the court filed it, and nobody could possibly predict when that would be. And all of these were in the same state (Calif) and hence under the same laws and courts, so why would they be so different?
In other news, our son is getting married tomorrow. He called to tell me that they'd just gotten their license and I asked him shouldn't they have issued them a learner's permit first? Tomorrow will be a legal ceremony so that she'll be covered by his benefits when they move back out here in another month or two, then they'll have the regular ceremony in August as they had planned.
Reminds me of my in-laws' wedding in Mexico City. First they were married legally by a state official and then a day or two later they had a church wedding. That night after the legal ceremony, he tried his luck by pointing out that they were married, after all, but she insisted, tough, not until the church wedding.