flightco
Well-Known Member
This really has morphed into many different directions; I am going to bring back some of the original points made.
This was never about Pros being worth what they earn, I and most here believe they could have earned much more if they put the effort and expense into a different career but they followed their heart and they are dance pros - I truly envy being able to do what you love for a living and I think most are worth every penny.
It is not about how much a pro makes at a comp. It was about the Top Teacher Award being an incentive that would lead some Pros to push their students beyond their financial means. Is there any pro here that does not feel this has happened? Not saying you do it, but that it is an incentive for the ethically weaker pros to take advantage of their students. Some here defending the pros said something about car dealers doing the same thing. I refuse to look at my pro like a car dealer.
I made the comment and I will expand on it that the light bulb came on and I realize the students are not the customer of the comp organizer. The Pro is their customer. We kept talking about the student paying the money, but from the organizers perspective that is not true. Their money comes from the Pro, not the student. We all need to realize, we are the Pro's customer and the Pro is the customer of the competition. As a comparison, I am buying a new lawn mower. I tried to contact the company with a question the local dealer could not answer. Took some sleuthing to find their number then was told I need to talk with the local dealer, didn't matter the dealer did not know the answer. Their attitude was the dealer is the one sending them the money, that is their customer. Do I like this? Not at all. Am I going to not buy what I think is the best value in a lawn mower because I don't like this? I am buying the lawn mower (I could go to another comp for the price of it) because it is the best lawn mower at the price for my needs.
I am sad that JnJ has taken this so personally. I have worked in the Columbus area and have spoken to people that know him and his studio, his reputation is flawless and I am sorry he felt the need to defend his practices. Once again (the Pro's and their defenders seem to keep missing this point) this is about less than scrupulous pros (not all pros who go to competitions ) pushing their students to spend more than they should and placing them in financial hardship. You can say they should know better and having seen this firsthand and several times, I can say that the emotion of dance (dance can bring tears to my eyes, I don't know why but sometimes it does) coupled with Rico Suave (who is the female version of Rico) telling you what a great dancer you are and you need to do more heats, more heats, more heats because you are so awesome and you need this, all the while just trying to pad their own pockets and not really caring about the student at all; probably one of the saddest things about ballroom dancing.
As to presenting the checks at the comp. I don't care how much money a pro makes, at the same time, I don't care how much a pro makes. I feel calling them up on stage and presenting these checks is really in your face to the students. Call them up for their dancing, call them up for the number of students they had who placed but if their is a cash award for bring the most students, I would prefer that was given out the same way the money was paid, send them a check. I started out at a franchise studio and at the Friday party they would always recognize the top teacher for the week (the one who gave the most lessons). There were many comments from students that they really didn't like this because it was really about how much money they spent.
In the end, it starts with our money and our choice to spend it how we see fit. Once the money is handed to someone else, it is their money and we have no say in how they use/spend/award etc. the money, it is now their money. Not sure why the point is so hard for others to see. Like I said, when customers are not present my company has awesome meetings and hands out huge cash awards in front of everyone, but never in front of customers because it would be off-putting to the customers. Not sure why the organizers do not see this.
This was never about Pros being worth what they earn, I and most here believe they could have earned much more if they put the effort and expense into a different career but they followed their heart and they are dance pros - I truly envy being able to do what you love for a living and I think most are worth every penny.
It is not about how much a pro makes at a comp. It was about the Top Teacher Award being an incentive that would lead some Pros to push their students beyond their financial means. Is there any pro here that does not feel this has happened? Not saying you do it, but that it is an incentive for the ethically weaker pros to take advantage of their students. Some here defending the pros said something about car dealers doing the same thing. I refuse to look at my pro like a car dealer.
I made the comment and I will expand on it that the light bulb came on and I realize the students are not the customer of the comp organizer. The Pro is their customer. We kept talking about the student paying the money, but from the organizers perspective that is not true. Their money comes from the Pro, not the student. We all need to realize, we are the Pro's customer and the Pro is the customer of the competition. As a comparison, I am buying a new lawn mower. I tried to contact the company with a question the local dealer could not answer. Took some sleuthing to find their number then was told I need to talk with the local dealer, didn't matter the dealer did not know the answer. Their attitude was the dealer is the one sending them the money, that is their customer. Do I like this? Not at all. Am I going to not buy what I think is the best value in a lawn mower because I don't like this? I am buying the lawn mower (I could go to another comp for the price of it) because it is the best lawn mower at the price for my needs.
I am sad that JnJ has taken this so personally. I have worked in the Columbus area and have spoken to people that know him and his studio, his reputation is flawless and I am sorry he felt the need to defend his practices. Once again (the Pro's and their defenders seem to keep missing this point) this is about less than scrupulous pros (not all pros who go to competitions ) pushing their students to spend more than they should and placing them in financial hardship. You can say they should know better and having seen this firsthand and several times, I can say that the emotion of dance (dance can bring tears to my eyes, I don't know why but sometimes it does) coupled with Rico Suave (who is the female version of Rico) telling you what a great dancer you are and you need to do more heats, more heats, more heats because you are so awesome and you need this, all the while just trying to pad their own pockets and not really caring about the student at all; probably one of the saddest things about ballroom dancing.
As to presenting the checks at the comp. I don't care how much money a pro makes, at the same time, I don't care how much a pro makes. I feel calling them up on stage and presenting these checks is really in your face to the students. Call them up for their dancing, call them up for the number of students they had who placed but if their is a cash award for bring the most students, I would prefer that was given out the same way the money was paid, send them a check. I started out at a franchise studio and at the Friday party they would always recognize the top teacher for the week (the one who gave the most lessons). There were many comments from students that they really didn't like this because it was really about how much money they spent.
In the end, it starts with our money and our choice to spend it how we see fit. Once the money is handed to someone else, it is their money and we have no say in how they use/spend/award etc. the money, it is now their money. Not sure why the point is so hard for others to see. Like I said, when customers are not present my company has awesome meetings and hands out huge cash awards in front of everyone, but never in front of customers because it would be off-putting to the customers. Not sure why the organizers do not see this.