Emotional maturity or what is that we are looking at - Gavito Festival 2024/Gustavo Naveira - Giselle Anne ?

Oh, this provides more information:


Edit: Did a bit more digging on Facebook, and this is what a prominent Polish organiser said (translated from Polish):

Unfortunately, this was not part of the performance. They had a fight before the show, after this action Giselle refused to dance the last song. At the very end of the festival Gustavo didn't dance in the ronda de maestros, Giselle danced with someone else:
"Gustavo and Giselle had some argument before their big Saturday night performance, and the argument continued on the ronda - where I could see Gustavo talking to her during the entire second song. I don’t know what he said, but I’ve heard later there was some pretty bad swearing. So Giselle refused to perform the last song".

Taken from this post:


which also includes plenty of griping over having to register as a couple (leader/follower) instead of separate registrations at marathons in Europe.

Honestly, I wouldn't know — I've never been asked by a follower to register with her, and all the marathons I've been to just give a discount for a couple registering together.
 
Last edited:
Absolutely appalling behaviour by Gustavo. Whatever happened before, you don't swear at or criticise your partner while dancing, let alone so very publicly. That's awful.
 
Absolutely appalling behaviour by Gustavo. Whatever happened before, you don't swear at or criticise your partner while dancing, let alone so very publicly. That's awful.
I guess besides this aspect of human behavior /respect (or emotional maturity as I phrased it in the title) the more interesting question is: now, that tango has become a profession (or, at least, we see a professionalization of tango) is there a deontology that comes with it?
 
A domestic argument goes public! Guess he's sleeping on the couch after that!

Unprofessional. Poor publicity. Does illustrate playing a role in the dance performance however you feel.

We don't know the background. Could just as readily criticise her for not completing the 'performance', i.e. the now expected encore for the audience, despite their obvious disagreement, but he handled it very poorly.

I guess solos, by definition, never mess up with their partner!
 
now, that tango has become a profession (or, at least, we see a professionalization of tango) is there a deontology that comes with it?
It's a performance, just like any other, on any stage. There have been disagreements before performances by players for centuries. Nothing new here.
 
It's a performance, just like any other, on any stage. There have been disagreements before performances by players for centuries. Nothing new here.
It is an incident, sure, but it showcasts values, behaviors and even norms that belong to the tango world/scene and not only to individuals alone. Basically , when you are a public figure what you do in public is more than just personal whims.
 
Took some of their workshops in recent years and they were constantly arguing to the point it was disrupting their own classes
 
It is an incident, sure, but it showcasts values, behaviors and even norms that belong to the tango world/scene and not only to individuals alone. Basically , when you are a public figure what you do in public is more than just personal whims.
Every scene (e.g. ballroom, theatre, choirs, 'pop' groups, tennis, etc) has similar scenes. Why just hang it on to AT? Nothing new. But now it gets filmed and is around the world in an instant. They held it together for their performance. If they'd retired to their 'dressing room' for their argument, or left the building, would we be any the wiser?

Yes, unprofessional. But nothing new with any couples working together. Do I need to judge them for whatever their disagreement was about?
 
It is an incident, sure, but it showcasts values, behaviors and even norms that belong to the tango world/scene and not only to individuals alone. Basically , when you are a public figure what you do in public is more than just personal whims.
I think the facts are clear. Social media sometimes loves things like this as a point of identification. I think the last big thing was the couple of women who were thrown out in St. Petersburg a few years ago.

For me, it's part of personal emotional maturity to see whether that can be applied to my environment. But I've never danced there in St. Petersburg, and I've never met this guy at a festival. And so I'm postponing any thoughts about a boycott etc. until that time.
 
I gather this situation deserves its own thread...what are your takes?
One, it is unquestionably unprofessional. It would be frowned upon if anyone did it, and celebrities are held to a still higher standard, because they are ambassadors and role models in their domain of expertise. This couple simply must know better.

Two, all people are human, and this sort of thing happens from time to time. It need not reflect on the culture of Tango, or even the general nature of the individuals. Always seek to avoid Fundamental Attribution Error.

***********

Basically, this is merely gossip that merits no action. The conflict is between the two dancers, and is their issue to resolve--or not--as they see fit. Event organizers might be hesitant to contract this couple in the future if such friction is a recurring pattern of behavior, but that doesn't mean much to any of us attendees.

On the other hand, if this is a pattern of behavior, it does perhaps mean that the couple should be treated as less of a role model. This hearkens back to the old question of whether the art can be separated from the character of the artist. I treat that on a case-by-case basis, and I don't know enough about these two to have any sort of informed opinion. In general, mere argumentativeness or abrasiveness is the sort of case where I would be fine with the separation, and continue to admire and accept the art even as I frown at the artist's character.
 
Last edited:
Two, all people are human, and this sort of thing happens from time to time. It need not reflect on the culture of Tango, or even the general nature of the individuals. Always seek to avoid Fundamental Attribution Error.
Good point!
Basically, this is merely gossip that merits no action.
I don't know about gossiping. Personally, I am not interested in what has happened between them and caused this behavior. What I see here is rather a case of 'the king is naked' and an opportunity for reflection.
 
postponing any thoughts about a boycott
Boycott what?
The event? The dancers? The dance?

Why? It's not even a consideration. They're human. They disagreed. The only issue is that a consequence was unprofessionally public, someone posted it on FB, it's travelled the world. Now people are looking about who to support, or pick sides, to cast blame, wrt a disagreement to which we're not party.
 
What I see here is rather a case of 'the king is naked'
I would also be cautious about the assessment "king". We know posthumously that Juan Carlos Copes, who I found to be even more unsympathetic in the media, had no retirement savings to stop dancing tango before his embarrassing performances. And as far as I understand, he died of a mixture of smoking, Covid and poverty.

And to put it bluntly: there is no victim here either. If this Gustavo Naveira had(!) known that he would(!) not live much longer, then this "naked suicide" could(!) have been his last service so that Giselle Anne could(!) make it on her own.
 
Last edited:

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top