JournalInTime
Forum Master
My solution has been not to study steps. I use the common names for steps on this forum because I want to engage in clear dialog here, but my opinion is that those names are useful only in these sorts of discussions!Tango is continuously evolving and if I don't update my dance my steps/tech will feel old fashioned/strange for a young, new dancer. Some years ago I had a shocking experience about that when a leader turned up with steps from 2004, my start year. It looked so odd and it was the main reason I started to update my dance 2019 at the most popular school in town.
As I've said many times in other threads, in my praxis, I work with "movement fragments": pauses, weight shifts, displacements, pivots, dissociations, suspensions, groundings, embrace changes, axis changes, level changes, etc. and their various speeds, sizes, and angles. I piece these together on the spot to express the music. As a result, my vocabulary has no specific date or school of origin, but is an answer to: (1) Does it fit the music?, (2) Does it fit the available space?, (3) Can I do it?, and (4) Can this partner do it?
I absolutely do recognize that this approach might itself be dated or trace its origin to a specific group of teachers.
On the flipside, I acknowledge that each wave or generation of dancers – and each school – has its ideas of What Is Done and What Is Not Done, and that many of my interpretations will fall into the latter category. I may be buying age-proofing at the price of being perceived as weird.
Though to be honest, I wouldn't want to dance with people who were stuck in specific ideas of Done/Not Done anyway. "Not safe" or "I can't do this" is fine . . . I mean, "That's weird, I've never seen it, and I refuse to do it." Whatever else I am as I age, "conservative" isn't it – I'm a progressive in all things, and doubly so in tango. So, that might age-proof my tango somewhat as well.