Sounds familiar!...even if most non-tango dancers seem to think the entire tango world is about competitions!
But anyway, just popping in to give my two cents on how competition works as a marketing and recruiting tool generally. I don't compete in AT, but I've competed seriously in dozens of activities over my life, and there are definite patterns that I would expect to hold true here as well.
The main pattern that I've seen has to do with the identity and behavior of spectators. There are generally two kinds of people who watch an amateur competition: the junkies who just can't get enough, and the competitors' friends and family cheering them on. The former group has already been recruited, so there's no need to market to them. The latter group already has significant awareness, and generally have already resisted recruitment--they are solely there to support a loved one.
There is a tiny slice of the second group that is different, I should say. A friend or family member to whom a competitor says, "come watch this, see if you like it, I think it's perfect for you," but there are so few of those as a proportion of the crowd that their number rounds to zero.
Conspicuously missing from this analysis? Curious strangers showing up from off the street. Doesn't happen.
**********
Taken together, it seems like amateur competition is pretty worthless as a recruiting tool, right? On the contrary, it is quite effective! Why the apparent contradiction? Because we now live in a world of YouTube. Look no further than several of the posts in this thread.
Competitions produce a ton of interesting topical content, and tend to showcase high-quality skills in a high-excitement environment. So once a stranger finally encounters the activity somehow, they go to the internet to learn more, and the long history of competition content becomes an ocean they can dive into and get hooked.
Of course, that means that overcoming that initial barrier of ignorance is still unaddressed. Competition alone doesn't help with that at all. But I would agree with others who talk about television shows and the general broader dispersion of experts as helpful for that, and competition is an indirect driver of both of those things.
***********
Unaddressed in this conversation and analysis is rumination on what it costs non-competitors to share a cultural space with competitors. It is absolutely non-trivial and non-zero. But that's maybe a discussion for another thread.
Last edited: