LadyLeader
Forum Master
In principle, I am of the opinion that we do not need trainers, coaches or instructors to learn tango. This does not mean that these people do not have particular knowledge and skills that I lack. Rather, it means that the student makes the curriculum, writes the syllabus. When things get stuck, he gets help from someone who can solve the problem. This approach is called constructivist. Basically that's how I learned tango, in other words, I taught myself. Now to the point that the teacher should pick the student. As indicated above, this was a very personal statement. I have gone through life without a Guru. But believe me, I've always wanted one. In 1992 it almost happend. I picked up the famous philosopher Ivan Illich from the airport to give a lecture at University. We started talking in the car, I opened my mouth and after two words Illich said: You are a teacher. He recognized me, I became his indoor student. Unfortunately, he died of cancer shortly afterwards. Illich did not leave a school of thought, his students dispersed.
Oh, it was a lot of information! Thanks!
I peeked into a short presentation of constructivism and it feels like a logical approach even if I may not go deeper on it now. I read also the link about Illich you provided and it must have been a fascinating and inspiring person to meet and follow!
When I restarted my learning I wanted to keep the initiative in my hands but meet a teacher for feedback and problem-solving. The frame for this is more based on the learning models I have traveled through during a lifetime without any specific personal philosophy base.