Light Sleeper
New Member
A follower who has tentative bent-knee mincing back steps is going to have back ochos that don't impress either. Its not about how far she reaches, its about the extension in her leg (and use of it) when she does. (although its easier to do it well when led to take a longer step when doing traveling ochos)
I'm skeptical that you need more space for one over the other... Maybe taking more space for the back ochos would give your follower the look you think only comes from front ones. And maybe you haven't learned to lead the front ones tightly... (I've been led in front ochos where the leader pivoted in his place and they took almost no room)
I think back ochos (esp the non linear, non traveling ones) are harder for leaders to lead properly (that's the only way I can account for how badly they so often get led) and harder for the follower to execute properly. I blame this on the fact that people get introduced to them practically in the first lesson (thus developing a lot of bad habits) and they aren't simple beginner moves.
I think that's what's wrong with me - it's in my mind, for some reason I believe I have to take huge steps - I can extend my leg straight if I take shorter steps and still maintain upper body relationship.
Totally agree that ochos are taught too soon - it's an intricate move which involves a fair grasp of technique.