oldtangoguy
Active Member
Okay. This is unclear.
Does she make contact with her right hand, allowing for the open side of the connection? If so, that's half the battle.
Is she willing to make contact, her hand on the lead's arm, say holding on gently below the bicep, on the closed side of the embrace? If so, that is the other half of the battle. In dancing oe, I try to never lead with the hand on my partner's back. That is not necessary to communicate what my chest is doing. In oe, my hand essentially rests there because it is conventional. If she is too far away to rest my hand on her back, no big deal. I do, however, expect her to manage the closed side of the embrace by holding my arm sufficiently to sense both rotation and linear motion.
So. If she is willing to connect hands on the open side and gently hold the leader's arm on the "closed" side, she can dance and have fun if the leads are accepting of an oe. The lead certainly does not need to hold on to her.
Does she make contact with her right hand, allowing for the open side of the connection? If so, that's half the battle.
Is she willing to make contact, her hand on the lead's arm, say holding on gently below the bicep, on the closed side of the embrace? If so, that is the other half of the battle. In dancing oe, I try to never lead with the hand on my partner's back. That is not necessary to communicate what my chest is doing. In oe, my hand essentially rests there because it is conventional. If she is too far away to rest my hand on her back, no big deal. I do, however, expect her to manage the closed side of the embrace by holding my arm sufficiently to sense both rotation and linear motion.
So. If she is willing to connect hands on the open side and gently hold the leader's arm on the "closed" side, she can dance and have fun if the leads are accepting of an oe. The lead certainly does not need to hold on to her.
Last edited: