My teacher does not lead but she knows the steps to teach. She says that leading is hard for women as they don’t have the upper body strength, reach or height for floorcraft. She says that to lead would interfere with her following skills. However, she is stunningly attractive and learnt to dance in her twenties…
I’m 5 foot and, after trying to lead a female ballroom partner, I found it extremely difficult as I lacked height, arm length and the innate male skill to lead and obey floor craft rules against 6 foot leads.
Funnily enough the new school that I’m trying tonight insists on teaching lead and follow…they may change their mind when see how petite I am!
You might be restricted to close embrace with followers that aren't
too different in terms of height and open embrace with everyone else, but if that's fine for you then it's all good.
Leading generally doesn't interfere with following; maybe some confusion when switching between
mindsets, which is natural because they are quite different, but that's all I can think of.
Unless, of course, you lead long enough and don't follow enough such that your following skills atrophy over time — which happens for essentially every skill in the world when you don't practise regularly!
All I can say is that ballroom is very different from tango, as you should already know.
Floorcraft isn't just about yourself, it's about every single couple on the pista. Even one or two couples gone awry can spoil the experience for everyone. It's a community effort.
And please don't speak about rules; they are more of
guidelines that are good to follow, but the fundamental principle is
respect for your fellow dancers.
If there is
adequate space, you can step backwards all you want, go in and out of the centre, even dance clockwise. They only really start to matter beyond a critical density of dancers. Even then, it's acceptable to do something like overtake a dawdling couple, if it's in the interests of the maintaining the flow.