..or is it a philosophical thing?
Good question! I feel recognized and at the same time somewhat misunderstood. Please allow me a more personal answer! And I needed these three sentences in advance to organize my thoughts:
I think my attitude, if I'm being completely honest, also reflects a certain contempt for those who take tango too seriously, those who see it as a substitute, and those who are personally offended if their style isn't appreciated. I, on the other hand, consider myself a technically well-trained actor: I take on a role and can simultaneously distance myself again. And more importantly, I can switch roles and play hide-and-seek.
And yes, you've really hit the point: it's philosophy. I feel the same way in philosophical forums or at academic meetings where the ultimate truth and the Holy Grail are being wrestled with. I taught History of natural sciences for five years at university. What I wanted to teach the students was critical distance. Sometimes this philosophical school contributes new insights, sometimes the countercurrent does. Philosophies also are just roles and costumes in the world's theater. (Of course a more bloody theatre).
I think you know my profound connection to music. That's why I laugh at all the superficialities of the individual tango styles. But this also allows me to deconstruct them. And one more thing: since I can no longer shine on the dance floor due to physical limitations, I'm looking for a position where I can (physically) withdraw without losing contact with the community. I'm now interested in how to detrain from tango. In martial arts, the higher levels are no longer achieved on the mat either.