JournalInTime
Forum Master
Yes, exactly! There are two basic approaches to being an organizer in AT:That's never a 'debt' to be paid off! That's marketing social AT to your community and potential newcomers.
1. Want to deem yourself a community-builder? Then you must do work that never ends, and that pays off mostly in appreciation. You might gain a little importance or money from it, but that's just a pleasant side effect – you cannot make it your end goal without becoming the second sort of organizer.
2. Believe that you've "paid your debt" and want to enjoy recognition for that in the form of importance or money? Then organize however and whatever you like, for whomever you like. However, don't go around claiming that you are "building" anything . . . you're no longer contributing, but rather are gatekeeping.
We see both approaches. The second one doesn't establish a "third place," though. At best, it's beside the point; at worst, it actively works against it.
Note also that both approaches can in principle be "for profit." The main difference is that the first either runs at narrow margins that just pay the overhead (often with organizers essentially volunteering much of the time), or runs at wider margins but reinvests in the community. The latter runs at wider margins so the organizers can pocket more. It's "community center" vs. "private gym," or "credit union" vs. "bank."
This isn't a moral judgment, by the way. AT needs both sorts of organizers!
As much as pure community-builders hate to admit it, what brings people to the community in the first place is often high-level performances and charismatic founder figures. These are features of the second approach more than the first. Nothing is truly "free," after all.
As much as gatekeepers hate to admit it, the viability of their businesses rests on the shoulders of "third places" that make the majority of dancers who are entirely ordinary and won't ever be "advanced" feel comfortable. These are what feeds glitzy shows and festivals, and what trickles a thin stream of new blood into their more exclusive events. And they are created by the first approach, not the second.
This is great when it happens! What makes it possible is taking the first approach to build community, and then once the community grows, making oneself small and letting the community stand in the spotlight – not putting oneself there.Not a lot of work for the 'organiser'; the 'community' did the work.