JournalInTime
Forum Master
That's what my partner calls the "walking-dead style": an extremely upright, fixed-height dance with minimal forward intention ("lean"), few changes of axis, and few vertical movements/changes of level; a fixed rather than sliding or breathing, and also slightly flat, embrace; more communication and energy exchange in the front body than in the back body; slow progress along the line of dance, approaching a slowly drifting slot dance rather than a striding dance; more turns that are walked than pivoted by the leader, and a lack of leader pivots in general; and many associated (flat) rather than dissociated (spiral) leader movement, placing the bulk of the labor of dissociation on the follower, who often responds by crossing rather than pivoting in turns. That does not describe everyone visible, and of course I'm not there in person! But from this snapshot, it looks to be the tendency – "the vibe," as it were. If my eye is poor, that's on me.
Whereas when my partner and I dance, we use what our coach calls an "inverted ice-cream cone" posture, with significantly more distance between us at the floor than higher up, but with regular axis changes in both directions (from volcada, through upright, to colgadita or "social colgada"). We embrace very tightly but roundly, not flatly, using our backs as much as our fronts, and with our closed-side arms sliding to open and close distance for expression, as well as to facilitate such things as her overpivots and sacadas. The basis of our dance is forward momentum, using a high-push walk and maximum leg projection, and often adding displacement to non-walking movements so that they progress. When we cannot progress, we often express the music in place with axis changes and level shifts. About half of my turns, the ones that don't move down the line of dance, have me pivoting/spinning rather than walking, dissociating more than my partner does to generate power, and almost all of our turns have her pivoting, not crossing.
I am not judging one as being better than the other! I am just saying there's what we like to do, and then there's a version of what other people like to do that isn't to my partner's taste. In point of fact, I'm a lot more patient about the first style above than she is, but I dance for her.
Whereas when my partner and I dance, we use what our coach calls an "inverted ice-cream cone" posture, with significantly more distance between us at the floor than higher up, but with regular axis changes in both directions (from volcada, through upright, to colgadita or "social colgada"). We embrace very tightly but roundly, not flatly, using our backs as much as our fronts, and with our closed-side arms sliding to open and close distance for expression, as well as to facilitate such things as her overpivots and sacadas. The basis of our dance is forward momentum, using a high-push walk and maximum leg projection, and often adding displacement to non-walking movements so that they progress. When we cannot progress, we often express the music in place with axis changes and level shifts. About half of my turns, the ones that don't move down the line of dance, have me pivoting/spinning rather than walking, dissociating more than my partner does to generate power, and almost all of our turns have her pivoting, not crossing.
I am not judging one as being better than the other! I am just saying there's what we like to do, and then there's a version of what other people like to do that isn't to my partner's taste. In point of fact, I'm a lot more patient about the first style above than she is, but I dance for her.