Interesting. Question is what characteristics the most desireable/“best” leaders have. Is it strictly the dancing skills? In my experience leaders are far more discerning about the dancing skills than followers. Follower perception of leaders dancing is often skewed by the leader’s social status in the community or the milonga. Irrespective of his dancing skills or lack of.
I leave the characteristics for others to decide, because it's such a nebulous thing. Rather, I observe behaviour: do they tend to look to him first? Do they orbit him? When he's at a milonga, are other leaders more ignored? Does he never seem to have trouble (or just much less trouble) finding a follower for the next tanda? Do followers like to dance multiple tandas with him? One or two things might not indicate, but together they are very telling of how desirable a leader is perceived to be.
What skews this is, as you say, social status. And professional dancers social dance in tango. Whether they're actually good or forgettable, they hold status as long as they're known. Unfortunately, us amateur (in the sense of non-professional) leaders are often compared to them and found lacking by amateur followers, which is honestly ridiculous, but that's life. I judge them too, but no one can judge me as harshly as myself.
If the follower registration fills up in opening minutes and leaders’ lags for weeks or months does it mean there are ten tango women/followers for every one leader or followers desire more to dance at festivals
No idea, really; the organisers know, but they're not telling. Although the gender balance isn't
that bad even at the largest festivals without any restrictions on registrations, so I'd surmise that if we consider, say, the
active (been to at least one milonga in the last month) tango population of Europe as a whole, there would be less than two followers to each leader.
What are you doing right now or what were you doing wrong before
I learned to hide my misanthropy and disdain for humanity better?
