I agree wholeheartedly.
But the DJ absolutely should not try to "educate" dancers on what's "danceable." That's a personal decision with no objective standard behind it, like creator, year, rhythm, tempo, etc. Some dancers struggle with a simple, monotonous beat at a low tempo because they have no mental metronome, or just bad walking technique, but do fine with music that's full of tempo changes and rubato and such that hides their weak points. Other dancers struggle with highly syncopated music, or music that changes tempos. Many love more orchestral, late-era "radio tangos" because they're closer to music they know better; others prefer old-timey stuff. Who's right? Nobody.
Which doesn't really address the matter of "danceable," because that's personal in all cases. As a DJ, it's best to cast a big net and make sure you have something for everyone . . . including people who don't share your tastes. Avoiding Piazzolla or Varela or whatever isn't going to increase the odds that your "customers" will be happy; if anything, it's going to reduce those odds by reducing the breadth of the selection.
I disagree with both @opendoor and @JournalInTime.The first point (arrow) in this announcement from a well-known tango influencer really annoyed me. Why should DJs learn to decide a-priori what danceable music is? I, as a dancer, will decide that. There's an ideologically driven movement in tango that wants to ban certain music from the dance floor, Piazzolla for example. This music always draws me to the dance floor with a magical force, and in my role as DJ, dancers regularly congratulate me on playing Piazzolla.
View attachment 6350
There is a reason that DJ is asked to play music. If you don’t like the DJ, don’t go to that milonga. That’s what I do.
You are citing anecdotal examples of music you like to dance to which you think DJ finds undanceable. I see it differently.
Last night I was at a sit down tango concert. The music was played by a trio of visiting musicians - (double) bass, bandeon, and piano. Each piece was about 4 to 5 minutes long. The music was good to listen to. More like jazz version of tango. I would not have been at all inspired to dance to it. If DJ played similar music, I would have cursed him/her and left. Later there was live music played for dancing and the floor was packed.
It is possible to dance any thing to any music, from the dances I am competent at. It doesn’t mean I want to dance tango to Ed Sheeran or Britney Spears. I regularly witness the WCS DJs playing music in which there is nothing to dance swing to. People are happily dancing to very bland music which is best suitable to put on when you are trying to fall asleep.
Within a genre there can be wide spectrum. People can like music that falls on some part of that spectrum. But to go beyond the spectrum (which some DJs do) and play music to which you could dance anything is where I draw the line. If I want to dance salsa, I won’t go to milonga and expect DJ to play salsa tanda (not in this century).
The argument then becomes where do you draw the line. @opendoor will want to draw the line which differs from where @JournalInTime wants to and where I might want to. How is a DJ suppose to keep everyone happy.
I think adding one or two tandas that go beyond mainstream of what dancers like is okay. But if 50% of the tandas is the music which I don’t consider danceable would make me want to demand a refund.
As to individual preferences, I think that is very different than dictating what DJs should take into considerations when creating the tandas. DJs should not have license to throw in bunch of tandas of some obscure barely danceable music. There is a reason it is obscure.
A DJ who can’t tell a difference between danceable and non-danceable music should not be asked to DJ. While a lot less in Tango, I have suffered enough of such DJs in other dances.
), what people want to hear/dance to and danceable music are distinct sets with an overlap.