:roll:
...compensating for... the compensation? I guess you'll finish... compensating the compensation of compensation!!
My point was, simply, that there are strengths and weaknesses in all types of learning environment.
For example, if you learn exclusively in 1-2-1s with a single teacher, you only get the viewpoint and experience of that teacher. But that doesn't mean you should never take 1-2-1s with a teacher. It means you need a mixture, and you need to be aware of those strengths and weaknesses, as you do with
all teaching / learning environments.
That's all.
Blimey.
Sure working on technique is better than memorizing moves or sequencies, but I don't think it will resolve the problem of practicing with the same partner.
Depends if your partner's any good. And if you are, of course.
Finding such a partner is not difficult... it's virtually impossible, because if you really want to learn, you don't need a partner at your level, you need a partner that is better than you.
No, because that's simply another name for an unpaid private class.
In a proper practice session, you give and take equally. The clue's in the name "practice partnership".
Blimey again.
If you are a follow, you need someone who can lead you, not someone who is trying to learn a complicated skill of leading. If you are a leader, you need a patient follow that will not anticipate and that will not try to compensate your errors, which is not so easy.
The only way to achieve this, is going to milongas and practicas, dancing with many people.
Firstly, if you use milongas to practice, then you're doing it wrong.
Secondly, if you go to a practica and just ask random partners for advice, how do you know that their advice is worth anything? They may be ignorant, they may be deluded, and they won't know enough about you to give critique which are relevant to you.
Apart from that...