At the end of the pandemic, maybe a new start?

I guess the question is how long it should take to become an instructor. Currently an ambitious beginner with little relevant experience can become a competent dancer in 1-2 years if they are willing to put the time in and dance a lot, and have access to competent instructors. I don't think it is unrealistic for them to become an assistant instructor in another 1-2 years if given training on how to teach, and gradually progress to leading a class themselves.
 
I guess the question is how long it should take to become an instructor. Currently an ambitious beginner with little relevant experience can become a competent dancer in 1-2 years if they are willing to put the time in and dance a lot, and have access to competent instructors. I don't think it is unrealistic for them to become an assistant instructor in another 1-2 years if given training on how to teach, and gradually progress to leading a class themselves.
I agree! The salient parts are "put the time in, "have access to competent instructors," and "given training on how to teach."

I wasn't super-ambitious, but I was in classes between 4 and 6 days a week from early 2013 to mid 2017, at first as a student and then repeatedly in the same classes as an accompanier. During that period, I also took private lessons with one, sometimes two, and occasionally three teachers a week, with two different working partners. I went to at least two group prácticas a week, and rented studio time for private practices. Near the end of those 4 years, I was trusted to be a teacher's stand-in demo partner, to give the free intro-to-tango classes, to be a substitute teacher for the occasional all-levels open class, and to organize/lead a práctica.

Based on my experience, I'd say that 2-4 years to assistant instructor is quite reasonable. In my case it took 4 years, but as I said, I wasn't super-ambitious . . . everything happened by chance, in that others picked me, and I was in the right places at the right times without making the least effort to be there. Also, I was on the old side for a new dancer, starting in my late 40s. An ambitious person in their 20s or 30s could easily do it in half the time.

However, a few people who started when I did and now pass themselves off as teachers didn't spend all week in classes, take back-to-back private lessons, rent practice space and practice, or phase themselves into teaching as substitutes and stand-ins first. They took a few years of group classes and then declared themselves teachers. I don't think anybody is "talented" enough for that to make sense.
 
Yeah, been in those environments. Does seem to generate the 'alternative', 'wellness', 'lifestyle' enthusiast finding an expression of AT as their outlet. Never did it for me, and probably unheard of in that GA source of 'tradition', but if it does it for you...
Since the tango has been revived by Broadway shows, "traditions", real or invented, may be of little interest. The only question is whether there are people who are interested in something. And such a "lifestyle" is almost mainstream in my eyes:

 
I guess the question is how long it should take to become an instructor.
The question is also whether someone does a job for little or no money without causing damage that no one else in the place at the time wants or can do for the money. Then it is first of all a "added value" for the tango.

I also do the DJ without speaking the Spanish language or playing a bandoneon in any way, although that would certainly be nice. But hey, the bottom line is that there is no one who would make this significantly better.
 
I guess the question is how long it should take to become an instructor. Currently an ambitious beginner with little relevant experience can become a competent dancer in 1-2 years if they are willing to put the time in and dance a lot, and have access to competent instructors. I don't think it is unrealistic for them to become an assistant instructor in another 1-2 years if given training on how to teach, and gradually progress to leading a class themselves.
The intro on Gustavo Javier Benzecry Sabá in one of his books reads:

Gustavo Javier Benzecry Sabá was born on April 26th 1959, in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

In 1982 he obtained a BS degree in Journalism.

For fifteen years he conducted various radio programs and edited various graphic media. He then worked almost simultaneously as a Chemistry Teacher, Musician, Videomaker and Graphic Designer.

His first book La mujer de los dioses, cuentos fantásticos, was published by Ed. Vinciguerra in 1999. Some of his work is also to be found in Cuentistas de fin de siglo, an anthology published by the same Publisher.

He first discovered Tango Danza in the late 1990’s and started teaching the following year. He has specialised in men’s techniques, but has also studied women’s techniques in depth.


And now...
 
And such a "lifestyle" is almost mainstream in my eyes:
One's own lifestyle tends to be regarded as 'mainstream', and we associate with 'PLUs' (People Like Us). What was once regarded as 'mainstream' is no longer accessible to many; any prospect of emulating that has passed in some countries depending on wealth inheritance. And, of course, children reject their parents' lifestyle choices.


The only question is whether there are people who are interested in something.
:)
 
I guess the question is how long it should take to become an instructor..
No, the true question is, how long it takes to become a teacher. And my answer is: only some seconds. The difference between teacher and instructor is that the former has a mission while the latter does not. Developing a mission requires a conflict between what you see and how it is meant to be. The teacher does not have to be an excellent technician, the instructor remains at this level.
 
Indeed; one should be free to dance with whoever one chooses; only that one's choices has consequences. In my experience though, many ladies will dance mostly (or even only) with men more/equally experienced/skilled than themselves, and of course this is their own choice, but then they can't very well turn around and complain that they're not getting as many dances as they would like because of their age/appearance/skill, since these men would naturally be in higher demand. It almost feels at times that men who are less experienced/skilled are invisible to many followers.

When a follower leaves courses and goes over to pista-learning mode i think she needs a more skilled partner to develop. Well recognized leaders are also rising follower ranking until they have established their own platform.

Surprisingly in societies with granted freedom for individual choices many of old gender patterns are getting stronger. Careers are split into female/male paths and partners choices are following the *nurse/male doctor* pattern according scientific studies. This could also be active here!
 
Well recognized leaders are also rising follower ranking until they have established their own platform.
That is true, which does lead to the next question: If they ignore a leader and refuse to dance with him when he is a still a beginner, why should he dance with them when he is "good enough" in their eyes?
Surprisingly in societies with granted freedom for individual choices many of old gender patterns are getting stronger.
This is very curious! So I assume, this goes for the "most" progressive countries like Sweden, Denmark, Finland, etc. too? Since there should be much less of a reason to choose one path over another because of your own gender, it seems to indicate something inherently different between males/females.
 
That is true, which does lead to the next question: If they ignore a leader and refuse to dance with him when he is a still a beginner, why should he dance with them when he is "good enough" in their eyes?
In my opinion, the mate strategy doesn’t work (if you have to solve your own problems and don’t act as a community builder). For this, too few beginners become "proficient" leaders, the times are too long, and disruptive influencing factors are too diverse.

And you need the mental reserves for it. When I recently found at a distant milonga that I couldn't invite the follower top-down in my order, I also did not invite bottom-up. I just didn't "want" to do that, what else is beer for at the bar?
 
That may be true now, but to whom are you going to hand over eventually? That time will come. Will you pass on the fire or the ashes?
Seriously? Not everyone will think that after a few good DJ sets I should instantly become a DJ teacher. ;)
But in fact, I plan to play in tandem with a friend, because then the entertainment value is greater - for the audience and also for me. Even if he is a novice in the DJ scope.
 

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top