JournalInTime
Forum Master
Even today, "if you can afford it" is an issue.There are certainly early records of tango boots and fine evening shoes - if you could afford them.
The perception that learning and loving tango is somehow for the rich is a bizarre illusion perpetuated by (1) how tango is depicted in movies these days (beautiful actors in extravagant costumes at Hollywood-ized events) and (2) the perception that the privileged few who can afford travel for festivals are the norm (not that most non-dancers even know about this). It's quite similar to the image problem that ballet, Broadway, classical music, and opera have: "Man, ain't nobody got money for that!"
I've met plenty of people who were passionate about tango but poor. For them, it was definitely a choice: Shoes or lessons? Shoes or events? Etc.
In my immediate tango social circle, there are numerous, mostly younger, mostly student dancers who can just barely afford lessons. They go to prácticas, which are often included in lessons and which are in any case cheaper than milongas, never mind festivals – but they never go to milongas. And that's the budget, so they dance in running shoes or their one good pair of formal shoes. I've even seen socks.
So, the need to teach tango that can be danced in something other than perfectly pivoting shoes is there.
That's a big deal for wealthier dancers. Plenty of women I know at the more modest end of the economic spectrum dance in street clothes and ordinary chunky shoes. The looks they get really don't help wipe out the perception that tango is snobby . . .Perhaps more on topic is the codigo(??) of high-heeled, strappy, shoes for female followers - and the whole supply business of tango fashion.
Last edited: