Then they are arses and greedy ones at that. And I would not want to work for a studio that all they cared about was money.
They can't afford to ignore money. There is a difference.
Ask questions, meet dancers, and be part of the conversation.
Then they are arses and greedy ones at that. And I would not want to work for a studio that all they cared about was money.
I believe there are consequences for every action...I already stated my position on this. I personally would not sign such a contract..but for discussion purposes lets say I did...If I felt serious feelings for someone and they for me I would discuss it with the studio owner and see what could be done to resolve it. If that meant leaving, so be it. But I do believe that many owners are reasonable and would see the value I bring and try to work it out.So under what circumstances do you think advance agreements *should* be honored?
We're talking here about rules that were agreed-upon. In any case, putting aside your position on rule obedience; what's your position on caring about the consequences of your actions for yourself and others?
It would be easier to hear "you only live once" if it came alongside an explicitly-stated position on the degree to which one's (ir)responsibility also matters in life.

I believe there are consequences for every action...I already stated my position on this. I personally would not sign such a contract..but for discussion purposes lets say I did...If I felt serious feelings for someone and they for me I would discuss it with the studio owner and see what could be done to resolve it. If that meant leaving, so be it. But I do believe that many owners are reasonable and would see the value I bring and try to work it out.
And you know situations change..the rule might have been agreed upon but we cannot predict the future. What if you fell head over heels for someone and they for you..would you say oh no I cannot see you because it is against the rules??? I'm sorry I am not that cold...I value love more than money.
You all seem to agree with each other so I am going to make dinner for my dance instructor boyfriend who I met at a studio and who I am madly in love with, and leave ya'all to your non- fraternizingI am perfectly happy fraternizing!
![]()
Customers having to honor the non-compete in some contract that an instructor signs as
employee at the studio??? What's with this? You are confusing customer contract with
instructor contract.
Totally different animals. And, for certainly, customer contracts won't/can't have non-compete
clauses.
Including that the student can't leave and take lessons elsewhere? Like a contract?Students at franchises sign contracts. Inside it states that the student will respect the polices of the studio.
No we weren't. But I guess I don't have as much as integrity as some of you because I'll tell you nothing could have kept us apart. And I knew it immediately...as did he.You are missing the major point many of the posters made--several said that they did not like the non-frat rules, but if you sign one you should abide by it or be upfront with your employer if you do not want to. Were you violating a non-frat clause when you two met and started your relationship?
Apart from the pros training for comps the majority of people learn ballroom to be social, right?...so it is pretty silly to have a policy that says you can't be social...its ridiculous.Including that the student can't leave and take lessons elsewhere? Like a contract?
My first studio had contracts they made us sign where we had to commit to x number of lessons/ month for a year.... If you left prior to the year being up, had to pay the difference. Major reason for leaving- I did not want to be bound to a contract. Someone took them to court and they won and the contract was found to be not legal, and not upheld by the judge.
Sorry did not mean to sidetrack the thread
I've seen it happen. Whenever an instructor quits or gets fired, some students refuse to take lessons with any other instructor and request their money back if they have any remaining on a package. If they find out that the instructor is teaching near by they might decide to follow them there effectively taking money from the studio that they used to work at.I think mostly those non-competes just give them the ability to sue if they steal clients from their previous employer.