That's a sexist point of view - but yes, I would agree.
Not sure how it can be sexist when it doesn't mention the sex of anyone. I said "leaders" and "followers." I didn't imply "men" and "women."
My experience is that people who listen for a signal to move and then interpret it ("followers") generally need a better feel for the music than people who do the signaling ("leaders"). This might be an artifact of how I was taught and how the people I prefer to dance with were taught:
I was taught that leaders should flow their steps together into a single respiration with a clear beginning, middle, and end, but not worry about the intermediate steps individually – as long as they keep the follower in front of them and comfortably embraced, they
will be followed correctly. In particular, leaders should not be using hard or sharp steps in some effort to get their follower to hit notes and accents; if they want to hit those things themselves, they can, but it should be "silent" to the follower. Thus, leaders mainly need to understand the music's big picture – where measures and phrases start and finish – so that they can flow smoothly from point of repair to point of repair (a nice side effect of which is being strongly encouraged to move constantly forward and avoid the temptation to park in place or take back steps).
Followers I know who were taught that way – the people with whom I prefer to dance – don't expect to feel their leader step. They expect to feel the general flow of the dance through their leader. Their own stepping comes from interpreting how to walk from point of repair to point of repair in the context of the music. Thus, followers need to understand the micro-phrasing of the music so that they know where to put things like the pivots at the corners of turns, and when they can triple a step or toss in an adorno. In practice, this means they have to be aware of more musical detail than leaders.
The "leader steps here [so the] follower steps here" philosophy is a valid teaching technique but not such a great dancing technique. Best practices are that the leader flows from here to there, very optionally marking individual notes or whatever for themselves only, while the follower steps as the music inspires them, in a way that keeps them in front of and in the frame of the leader.
(I should add that some flow from A to B organically generates accent leads. If my flow terminates or reverses sharply at a break in the phrasing, it'll create a boleo (or whatever). Interestingly, this puts the "natural" spots for such accents at measure and phrase boundaries, not on accented notes mid-measure or mid-phrase.)
But all of this is true whatever the sex of the leader and follower. It isn't about sex. It's about role.