JournalInTime
Forum Master
I know few tango dancers who care about performances. Most fall into the "Pay more to get into an event where I get to dance less? Bah!" school of thought. However . . .Maybe they don't impress you much, but other attendees do seem to like them since numbers go.
. . . the people collecting money at the door don't care if you're coming to watch or to dance. More people attend when Big Names are putting on a show. Of course, since those extra spectators don't dance, this is contingent upon a real performance – not a one- or two-piece demo, but at least one tango, one vals, and one milonga, plus one to three encore pieces, with enough mugging and thanking before, between, and after to fill 30 minutes or so, and ideally a chance to meet and take photos with the stars.
None of which brings anybody into tango.
After 12 years of dancing probably too much, I know our local spectators-not-dancers crowd to see. They are mostly the same gang every time: friends of tango dancers and of organizers, a few dance fans coming to see a dance TV show live (more or less), a smattering of journalists, a couple of local residents who drop in to watch, etc. None of whom ever turn up on the dance floor – they are perpetual watchers who never get bitten by the dance bug. So, shows do nothing to grow the tango scene, only to grow the bank accounts of organizers.
The effects on the tango scene are: (1) more money for organizers means more studios stay open and host more milongas, prácticas, lessons, etc., and (2) more dancers who would come out to dance anyway trying to emulate the stars' movements while remaining oblivious to the fact that those stars are infinitely more skilled (having started as teenagers and danced for decades as a full-time career), have the entire floor to themselves, and are almost certainly showing off part or all of a choreography they have refined for years. I think that #1 is great and that #2 is terrible, but I am undecided regarding which one I care about more.