Tango Diaries

After we have started together, we sit apart. We get thanked for doing this, it makes it clear we are open to dancing with others. Couples that sit together don't get asked as much.
That's interesting; I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples of life partners who only dance with each other. At the typical milonga I go to, about half the room will be there with someone I guess to be their life partner, and there's no barrier to dancing with either of them.
 
At the typical milonga I go to, about half the room will be there with someone I guess to be their life partner, and there's no barrier to dancing with either of them.
But that isn't following the códigos:eek::oops::rolleyes: (I'm shocked! Truly shocked!). It certainly applies throughout the UK AFAIK - at least where you're known, which may be key. My acquaintances who frequent BsAs for prolonged periods, inform me that, in order to get dances there, you must go separately, even if known. Also, similarly from some reports from the US. From personal experience there may also a more dated approach in parts of Austria (the male will be asked for permission...), but you have to observe the game in play at an unknown milonga. Local cultural rules have subtle quirks and not all countries are as 'liberated' (ah, 'freedom':cool:) as some like to think.

Refer also to previous discussions, notably regarding film depiction.
 
That's interesting; I think I've only ever seen a couple of examples of life partners who only dance with each other. At the typical milonga I go to, about half the room will be there with someone I guess to be their life partner, and there's no barrier to dancing with either of them.

Generally if a couple shows up and sits together and mainly interacts with each other, its up to them to actively invite others if they want to dance, otherwise people will just naturally assume they don't want to

the social dynamic probably changes if there are a high proportion of couples
 
Generally if a couple shows up and sits together and mainly interacts with each other, its up to them to actively invite others if they want to dance, otherwise people will just naturally assume they don't want to

the social dynamic probably changes if there are a high proportion of couples
You're correct about interaction with others - but that's just the same as for solos of either role. It's just the additional cultural aspects related to inviting, usually by a male, of the female half of a couple. Obviously there are local cultural codes, however that doesn't seem to apply here in the UK where people/couples are 'known' - which always seemed the unusual aspect of the stories relating to BsAs' barrio and its códigos, but that was in another era. Other countries have related, but different, cultures.


I don't think the proportion of couples affects the social dynamic in a group where people know one another - at least as acquaintances. Elite milongas with their own cliques are obviously another issue where other games may be in play.
 
But that isn't following the códigos:eek::oops::rolleyes: (I'm shocked! Truly shocked!).

Not sure which particular :D

To me codigas are no more than mannered or well behavior codified. That doesn’t mean it is inflexible.
My acquaintances who frequent BsAs for prolonged periods, inform me that, in order to get dances there, you must go separately, even if known.
Never been to BsAs. All my knowledge is second hand either through blogs or stories from friends who frequent there.

My impression is there is no homogenous milonga culture. It varies depending on which milongas you go to.

I too have read that if you enter together then it is assumed you are couple at least for that evening in the dance context. But you can still make present available to dance with others.

With so many milongas, I doubt it is followed universally. Though anywhere else in the world too, if you see clearly that two people have arrived together, that they are either friends, acquaintances, or actual couple. Then you observe if they prefer to dance with each other or with others too. I don’t think that observation happens due to conscious efforts.

Also, similarly from some reports from the US.
Reports about what exactly?


From personal experience there may also a more dated approach in parts of Austria (the male will be asked for permission...), but you have to observe the game in play at an unknown milonga.

Asking for permission vs being courteous to acknowledgement presence is a debate that will never end. Not only in tango but other dances too. Many or some in the west take offense to it for reasons well known, while others don’t find it offensive for reasons well known. That debate will never end. Women don’t have to do asking of men. Therefore women have far less chance to ask permission or acknowledge man’s partner when wanting to dance with the men. But I seen it play out subtly. The man asks a woman. Woman accepts but also looks at man’s partner. It also depends of degree of familiarity between who is asking and who is being asked. If a couple is seating together formally and you want to ask a woman, you might nod to the man or acknowledge his presence. I don’t find anything wrong with that. On the other hand if it is more casual, and a couples together have been seen clearly dancing with others or you kind of known them both or one of them, you could ask the lady without giving a glance to her partner. That works too. It really depends on the situational context.
Local cultural rules have subtle quirks and not all countries are as 'liberated' (ah, 'freedom':cool:) as some like to think.

I don’t think “liberation” or “freedom” means lack of etiquettes. I have said this many times. In a bar or anywhere else if two men are talking and a third man walks into join them - he will acknowledge both. Or people want to steal one of the two people in a conversation, they will seek permission of the other person. Nothing to do with the gender.

Does that means there is no machismo in certain cultures or countries or in dancing? Not true. You could have men who will feel their pride hurt if you ask a lady with him without giving him a smile or nod (which locally may be interpreted as seeking permission).

I have also found very liberated feminist women that can feel it a bit offensive or rude if their partner is totally ignored or disregarded when seeking a dance.

It is all about EQ and etiquettes no matter whether liberated or conservative settings. A good EQ takes you a long way.
 
Generally if a couple shows up and sits together and mainly interacts with each other, its up to them to actively invite others if they want to dance, otherwise people will just naturally assume they don't want to

the social dynamic probably changes if there are a high proportion of couples
There are also couples where one of them dances with others while the other half prefers to only dance with their own partner.

I seen this with both. But slightly more with women in milongas I go to. 2 or 3 women specifically but that’s an extremely small sample size.

At least one is not a couple in real life. They are just dance couple.

Then you have those who have hired their partner for the evening (personal taxi dancer). The hired person may dance with others if the person who hired wants to break or sitting out a tanda.
 
My impression is there is no homogenous milonga culture. It varies depending on which milongas you go to.
Yes, totally.
I too have read that if you enter together then it is assumed you are couple at least for that evening in the dance context. But you can still make present available to dance with others.
Yes. If it's a very formal one with segregated seating on opposite sides of the room and couples' tables at the end, then you do want to either walk in separately or ask to be seated separately. But it's not the case in many milongas. I visited with both a then-girlfriend and a female friend sitting at the same table together, and neither of us had any issues inviting or being invited.
 
But that isn't following the códigos:eek::oops::rolleyes: (I'm shocked! Truly shocked!)....
Nobody but you and me even remembers the ban on cabeceo at tables anymore. But I also think cabeceoing in the singles' corners is outdated. Knowing the codes is common knowledge, but applying them depends on the situation.
 
Nobody but you and me even remembers the ban on cabeceo at tables anymore. But I also think cabeceoing in the singles' corners is outdated. Knowing the codes is common knowledge, but applying them depends on the situation.
Here is a newbie question. Why are things like women leading not a problem but things like cabeceo something that feels must be strictly enforced?

I know some folks that don’t go to milongas and only do queer/alt/fusion events because they feel they don’t fit within this super machista culture. “Yeah, hate being treated like a creepy dude that can’t take a verbal no”.

It’s a bit weird to me because in the US the tango is not common place like Argentina. You can’t find it at a bar. You won’t run into it in a plaza. Yet it feels like tango in the US has this fixed yet randomly antiquated set of codigos and rules. You don’t ever expect a woman to show up to a milonga with a non dancing chaperone aunt but if you don’t cabeceo someone properly you are made to feel like you’re smoking indoors or asked someone how much they make in salary.

Other dances like salsa have different etiquettes that changed over time to fit US society a bit better —- women ask men a lot more, it is frowned upon to ask the partner for permission instead of her directly, walking someone off the dance floor feels creepy.
 
Here is a newbie question. Why are things like women leading not a problem but things like cabeceo something that feels must be strictly enforced?..
I can only offer my European perspective on this here. The influential figures who, from around 2007 onwards, propagated the ideological backward roll in tango (i.e., strictly LOD, music in tandas, the banning of boleos, and the classification of Piazzolla as undanceable) have switched sides from the far right to the far left. Don't ask me why they did it! My personal view is that they always wanted to distance themselves from the mainstream establishment in order to offer an more unique selling point. In other words, they simply are knd of weather vanes, and the tango crowd is obedient. So, with other words, it's not about ideology, but simply about market strategies.
 
Nobody but you and me even remembers the ban on cabeceo at tables anymore. But I also think cabeceoing in the singles' corners is outdated. Knowing the codes is common knowledge, but applying them depends on the situation.
There's always a tango pundit, or would-be influencer, or over-zealous newbie convert, or tango pedant, or..., who lives with the haunting fear that somebody, somewhere, not in BsAs, may actually be enjoying dancing Argentine Tango within their own cultural social heritage in this day and age.

Yep, the key anywhere (even visiting a foreign country!), is to observe the rules of the game and local variants, i.e. 'respect'.

But you can't 'demand' some rule as strictly necessary and then ignore the ones which have become outdated (like couples section) in many cultures.
 
Here is a newbie question. Why are things like women leading not a problem but things like cabeceo something that feels must be strictly enforced?
Depends where you are.
I know some folks that don’t go to milongas and only do queer/alt/fusion events because they feel they don’t fit within this super machista culture. “Yeah, hate being treated like a creepy dude that can’t take a verbal no”.
That's a much bigger question about toxic masculinity and everything associated. To paraphrase Frrank Zappa:
I’m not female, but there’s a whole lots of times I wish I could say I ain’t male.

I can only guess, in part, that some of these males are insecure and need some concept to support themselves. There are other causes, but we're not going to fix broken society here. Dance helps!
 
My personal view is that they always wanted to distance themselves from the mainstream establishment in order to offer an more unique selling point. In other words, they simply are knd of weather vanes, and the tango crowd is obedient. So, with other words, it's not about ideology, but simply about market strategies
AT is 'alternative'. If the locale hierarchy is 'left'; go 'right'. If it's 'right'; go 'left'.
 
Dear Diary...

...looking back on the past year, my SO says she now dances more and better than when she was single. Initially, it was an open question whether exchanging kisses and other signs of affection on(!) the dance floor would be detrimental. In her case, the answer is no; she can dance more freely with men who may have partners, or may not. And if the men who reveal unpleasant character traits, possessiveness, or simply become clingy stay away, it's even more pleasant at a milonga for her.

I've also heard that with partner behavior, you won't get any invitations from Argentinians at "traditional" milongas. Well, that's not our problem; we live far, far away. Argentina is, after all, a Catholic-conservative country, and there are probably a reasons why no other country has a higher density of psychologists than Argentina:

 
Last edited:
..Argentina is, after all, a Catholic-conservative country, and there are probably a reasons why no other country has a higher density of psychologists..
When Bergoglio still was in Buenos Aires, I was very! dissatisfied with him. He stabbed some German priests (I am friends with) in the back instead of standing up against the junta. But the fact that he himself, as a seminarian, still went to the pista, I'll give him credit for.

 

Dance Ads

Advertise on Dance Forums Reach dancers, teachers, studios, event organizers, and dance-friendly brands. View ad options
Back
Top