JournalInTime
Forum Master
The only way someone without a professional eye (like that of a coach or teacher) can judge anything about anybody's dance from the outside is to look at how they dance with several partners – the more, the better. A sample size of 1 partner tells you absolutely nothing. A sample size of 2-3 partners in a row often tells you only that a certain gang of dancers who dance a certain way have latched onto this person. A sample size of 5-10 partners at different points throughout the evening is usually enough.I will account for the leader's ineptitude and the interaction of different body types, but if it keeps happening, I am assume that she's just bad.
If you don't like waiting that long, check them dancing with 2-3 partners and then switch focus to see how those 2-3 partners dance the next couple of tandas with others – particularly others you know and like to dance with. If their partners suddenly exhibit the same set of problems, it isn't the fault of the dancer you find interesting. It's their earlier partners making them look bad.
This second approach is the one I use. We have quite a few guys around here who make every follower look bad. Were I a visitor, a hasty judgment would lead me to avoid those followers. Generally, I tend to assume "Bad follower technique? 50/50 odds it's a response to bad leader technique." Actually, due to being in a follower-heavy scene, competition on the follower side is far more aggressive than that on the leader side, so followers tend to have better technique on average and the real odds it's a response to bad leader technique are closer to 75/25.