This is why I sometimes say, "There are a lot of preferences being masqueraded as rules".
Quite right.
Ask questions, meet dancers, and be part of the conversation.
This is why I sometimes say, "There are a lot of preferences being masqueraded as rules".
This ^Actually, in the long run, it was quite enlightening... because it helped me see the folly of the whole "right and wrong" concept. Its all very personal and you have to be open to the subtle signals from the other person to figure out whether what you are doing is right for THEM regardless of whether it is "right" according to some teacher you had. That's why I didn't bother to elaborate on what each of them wanted or didn't want. It's irrelevant. The only relevant thing is that they wanted totally different things and the only way I could please them both is by doing different things and ignoring what I might have been "taught" to do.
Yep. Theory is great and all...in theory...but if you gotta toss it out the window when it comes to the actual reality of the situation, well...you gotta do what you gotta do. No sense standing on principle when it just doesn't work.Zoo said:The only relevant thing is that they wanted totally different things and the only way I could please them both is by doing different things and ignoring what I might have been "taught" to do
This is why I sometimes say, "There are a lot of preferences being masqueraded as rules".
One thing that makes a lot of the opinions by both sides on leading vs following difficult to compare, is because most of us primarily do one or the another. Thus (I) as a leader really don't know that much about what other leaders do (or feel like). We mostly only know what other leaders tell us, and what we can see. On the other hand, we know quite a bit about our experiences with other followers.Strangely, generalising wildly so please don't flame, experience tells me it tends to be ladies who absorb the latest teaching to become a rule. More experienced ladies (but not all by any means), like experienced men, tend to be more accommodating.
the follower started complaining to me about how I wasn't doing then exactly like the teacher did, and so on. I politely listened, and when she was finished, I asked her, "how do they feel?". She thought for a moment, smiled and then said, "actually, they feel very good".
I think there may be all kinds of psychological, cultural or "brain wiring" ways to explain what you are John Em are saying. However the bottom line seems to be this:
Women implement the teaching in a class more quickly than the men.
I almost said they pick up the teaching faster, but I decided that might not actually be the case (after John Em's mention of deliberate experimenting and such)
Whether they are learning it faster or just mimicking it more faithfully or more inclined to follow directions or just more natural at picking up movement or they just have less to worry about in the moment because they are doing the step they were showed rather than having to lead as well, or, or, or... We could have a whole thread debating all that. BOttom line...
Women do (as a sweeping generalization) implement the teaching of the lesson faster IN the lesson than the guys do. (and often sooner out of the lesson)
That's been my experience both as a student leader, a student follower and a teacher.
And frustration can easily lead to the lady back-leading which isn't usually helpful.
Men need time to work it all out for themselves, each in their own way,
mentally, physically and spatially in order to master their role. So patience
is needed by the lady and the man needs a determination to succeed.
I have found that the best thing to do in a class (on the rate occasions that I take a group class anymore) is follow what the man leads even if it wasn't what was taught. That means that if he doesn't lead the move correctly, I don't do the move. Occasionally someone will gripe that I'm "not doing my step". However, I've also had guys flat out thank me for not doing the step if they don't lead it right, so they can figure out where they're going wrong. Often that is more informative for them than verbal feedback on what they need to do.
I figure there's not a lot of long term hope for the ones who gripe anyway, but the ones who realize the value of me following what they ACTUALLY lead have potential to become really good leaders.
I have found that the best thing to do in a class (on the rate occasions that I take a group class anymore) is follow what the man leads even if it wasn't what was taught. That means that if he doesn't lead the move correctly, I don't do the move. Occasionally someone will gripe that I'm "not doing my step". However, I've also had guys flat out thank me for not doing the step if they don't lead it right, so they can figure out where they're going wrong. Often that is more informative for them than verbal feedback on what they need to do...
Going to slightly disagree here, not with the resultant failure but the cause.I agree entirely. If the follower gives the leader the step, he doesn't know whether he's led it or not. Then he takes it out on the dance floor and can't figure out why his partner isn't doing the step.
OTOH, I've been in classes where I figured out a sequence, but my partner hadn't yet and was trying to follower what the teacher was saying. I asked her to just permit me to lead her, and then it all worked out fine.
It's even worse when your partner is craning her neck to see teacher while
you are trying to lead the movement he/she happens to be demonstrating.
So she is trying to dance with teacher while you are trying to dance with her.
It never works.
Looking at it from the other side (just to cause trouble) the follower perspective on this is that the guy won't just wait a sec while she watches the teacher demonstrate something she wants clarification of.
I know I've found it irritating when the teacher is still talking and demonstrating and the person I'm supposed to dance with has already stopped listening and wants to try it. Sometimes the teacher has moved off the leader's role and onto follower tips and the leader automatically thinks... "ok, not info for me" and forgets that his partner DOES need to hear that part.
If the teacher is demonstrating for another couple (not the class) after the "try it" point has started, then its still possible that your partner wants more info or wants the teacher's attention, or has a question they think the teacher might be addressing.
Frankly, I fail to see the logic of diverting your partner's attention AWAY from the instructor while the instructor is trying to demonstrate or explain things. It also seems pretty rude to the teacher if they are still trying to give the class info, so I assume you mean while the teacher is working with another couple. From my point of view, you'll have lots of time to work with it on your own later, and it makes sense to take advantage of everything the teacher is saying while you have them present and offering tips.
You sneaked in an edit!! A long one! .