I agree with two things in the article:
1. Copying/memorising steps is not sufficient
and
2. You don't need to be Argentine to be a good teacher.
Can't say either of these are exactly earth-shattering news, but I'm willing to concede the message might bear some repeating.
I have two gripes with the article. One general one and a specific one:
* General: He needs to make up his mind about Argentina. He rants about how Tango is mostly a tourist thing there, the country in an awful state, the Argentine teachers poor etc etc. But in the end he ends up justifying his methods by referring back to, yes, Argentina, quoting Argentine sayings and pointing out how Argentines would so agree with him:
"It's a route which is well understood in Argentina."
Eh....I though you said the guys out there didn't know how to do things. Make up your mind.
* Specific: Bit of a hobby horse here, but I got very annoyed about him telling his hypothetical follower off for wanting to dance cheek-to-cheek "uninvited". Huh?!?! I mean, I do my best to follow the lead (don't always succeed, but I agree that's the aim!) but I had always understood the type of embrace to be a kind of joint decision and know for a fact that some men are uncomfortable inviting a woman closer for fear of being perceived as intimidating or sleazy. I myself am an avid CE and cheek-to-cheeker and will usually try to move in. Sure, if I sense discomfort I won't shove my face into his cheek, but surely a follower can initiate this?
His justification for not dancing cheek to cheek seems very odd to me too:
"I need her to face me so that she is alert to my lead, as I am to her response, if there is one"
Again, huh!?! Why would I need to be able to look him in eye to be alert to his lead? That doesn't seem very "touch-based" to me. I usually have my eyes shut anyway.